Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Donna DeProspo's avatar

Thank you for the explanation. I regularly share these posts, I just hope my fb friends take the time to read it.

Expand full comment
docrhw Weil's avatar

Your explanation makes a lot of sense, Thom. Unfortunately too much of the American population has a very low knowledge of science, let alone routinely practices critical thinking and data analysis. So this will literally go over their heads. In addition, it's a lot to expect most people to connect the dots. The homeowner in Ohio paying higher insurance rates is unlikely to see that as connected to the company having to make up for bigger claims due to Florida hurricanes. And even if they do, linking that to climate change is a stretch. And naturally nobody (including me) wants to say they are partially responsible for ongoing disasters...or pay for them.

All this simply means that strategic education showing these connections has to be clearly and repeatedly presented to the public. And this is something the news media almost never does today, although from what I've seen a fair number of high school students do have a sense of what is happening. As usual, change will come from the bottom up as the public slowly becomes aware of environmental linkages, and hopefully a tipping point will be reached where change is effectively demanded from "leaders." But these will neither be easy nor quick; hopefully we have enough time to make that shift. And once we do, supporting developing countries that will not or cannot easily make major energy changes will be a whole other issue.

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts