Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rxan Smith's avatar

The Nixon comparison cuts deeper than it might appear on first read. Nixon lied about being a crook... but the lie required him to acknowledge that being a crook would disqualify him. That accountability premise is what's completely gone now. The current posture isn't "I'm not a crook." It's "so what if I am." That's not a difference of degree. It's a different theory of power entirely... and it's the one worth debating here.

Michael's avatar

This feels like a trial balloon. If he can get away with being on both sides of a “settlement” of this amount, what’s to stop him from doing the same thing, to the benefit of himself and his cronies, for $2 trillion? His lackeys in Congress and on SCOTUS surely will not object.

31 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?