Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John R Brakey's avatar

Thom, Thank you for another thoughtful Independence Day reflection.

Regardless of where people fall politically, I believe your central message is one worth considering: a constitutional republic ultimately depends on informed citizens and institutions that remain accountable to the people.

For more than twenty years I've worked on election transparency, and I've come to believe that public confidence cannot rest on trust alone. It must be supported by evidence that ordinary citizens can independently verify.

Voting should always remain secret. Counting should always be publicly verifiable.

When citizens can see the evidence for themselves—whether they ultimately agree with the outcome or not—confidence grows because transparency replaces suspicion.

As we celebrate America's 250th birthday, perhaps the greatest gift we can leave future generations is not simply asking them to trust our institutions, but building institutions that deserve their trust through openness and verification.

Happy Fourth of July, and thank you for continuing to encourage thoughtful public discussion.

— John Brakey

Executive Director, AUDIT USA

William Farrar's avatar

The ruling elite want you to believe that things are not as bad as they are, that, for instance, that SCOTUS is not totally white, male, Christian, fascist, by trumpeting the few times that the court has ruled or appeared to rule against Trump. The strategy is to not alarm the victims that they are next on the chopping block.

Take the latest ruling on birth right citizenship, was it rally a victory? Read Kavanaughs dissent, he didn’t just disagree, he gave Trump a roadmap to overturning birthright citizenship, in fact SCOTUS in every ruling against Trump has done so on hard to deny technical terms, but then showed him how to do it “right”. And Trump treats judicial rulings, even SCOTUS, as optional and who is going to stop him? The DOJ his personal law firm,his personal police?

Where the partisanship and prejudice of the judicial system comes into play, is first: at lower courts by issuing temporary injunctions, which they know are temporary thud tellomh the Trump regime go back and refine your case, then the appeals court, especially the 5th, 8th, 11th and DC courts will find for and with Trump, but when district appeals courts do not side with Trump, SCOTUS will side with him in the shadow docket, and because it is an unsigned refusal by the shadow docket it doesn’t get the publicity of an open court case and ruling.

During his first term, the Trump administration secured a high success rate at the Supreme Court, winning in approximately \(90\%\) of the cases and emergency orders it was involved in

In his second Administration he has won 31 our of 35 times in open court, and 100% in the shadow docket and with his losses, he is provided a road map by the judges how to go back and win

17 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?