Suppressing the Vote with Provisional Ballots
Your weekly excerpt from one of my books. This week: "The Hidden History of the War on Voting"
Suppressing the Vote with Provisional Ballots
The Help America Vote Act may provide another answer to the puzzling mystery of American red shift (where exit polls show Democrats won but Republicans got the most recorded votes).
That legislation, written in large part by Representative Bob Ney, R-Ohio, contains a provision requiring people who show up to vote—even if they’ve been purged from the voting lists—to be given something called a “provisional ballot.”
“The main reason we did that,” the former congressman told me, “was because, particularly across the Deep South, people were simply being turned away at the polls. In most cases it was because they were black, but in many cases it was also being done in districts where the opposition party controlled most of the election apparatus, typically Republicans turning away people in Democratic districts.
“We wanted to make sure,” he added, “that every eligible voter had both a chance to vote and some level of certainty that his or her vote would be counted after they went to all the trouble of voting.”
The parable about the road to hell being paved with good intentions is worthy of citing here. The HAVA law was passed on a bipartisan basis, after the hanging-chad disaster in Florida in the 2000 election was the main excuse given the media for that state’s substantial red shift. But the giant loophole it created for GOP vote suppressors was that provisional ballots are almost never counted.
Rules vary from state to state, but usually if voters are given a provisional ballot, they must then, within a few days of the election, present themselves in person at a state or county office to prove that they are who they say they are and that they were legally registered to vote and were purged incorrectly.
The HAVA law requires that voters getting provisional ballots be told this, but in actual practice in Republican-controlled states this is almost never the case. (Although, even when it is, the percentage of people who’d be willing or able to take time off work to jump through all these hoops is tiny.)
Independent investigative reporter Greg Palast, whose work is published by the BBC, the Guardian, Rolling Stone, and Salon, found this to be very much the case (and worse) when he accompanied Martin Luther King Jr.’s 92-year-old cousin, Christine Jordan, to the polls in Georgia, and poll workers repeatedly refused to give her even a provisional ballot until Palast intervened.109
After voting for half a century in the same place, she’d been purged from the rolls by Secretary of State and gubernatorial candidate Brian Kemp’s policies and people. Eventually, after multiple tries with Palast threatening lawsuits and making a scene on camera at the polling place, Jordan got a provisional ballot, although it almost certainly was never counted.
In the years immediately preceding the election, Kemp had purged well over a million voters from Georgia’s rolls and prevented the registration of around 50,000 mostly African American voters from being processed. In all probability, large numbers of these people turned out and voted anyway, with provisional ballots. And, not realizing that their provisional ballot vote would never actually be counted, if they encountered an exit-poll taker outside the polling place, they probably would have registered their vote with the pollster.
Thus, one simple explanation for all that red shift in Republican-controlled swing states is that the voters reporting their Democratic votes to exit pollsters simply didn’t know that their vote would never be counted, and neither did the pollsters.
None of these issues are part of the mainstream of public debate in America, although they’ve been hot topics in other countries, from Australia to Ireland to Canada. Perhaps if enough of us speak out, one day soon our election exit polls will again agree with our vote tabulations.
As always,Thom, your Hidden History book series are Treasure's All, and should be in every classroom in America. Terrific excerpt this morning ☕ and will reStack ASAP 💯👍❄️🌲⛄
The only defense against voter suppression is voter diligence.
RED-state vote rigging is not new. The GOP will do anything it can to win - including vote suppression. Nevertheless, the voters themselves often enable the provisional ballot scam by not showing up to vote with sufficient proof of registration - their voter registration card and picture ID like a drivers license. Low diligence seems to be more common among Democrats - especially among lower-income voters. Is the Blue party reminding voters to bring necessary IDs to vote as part of their canvassing? Unlikely.
Being in my late 70s, I qualify to register for automatic vote-by-mail in RED Florida. The year Trump won, my ballot was rejected because somebody arbitrarily decided my signature on the envelope did not match the one on my registration. I had to submit a digital image of the front and back of my military ID for my vote to be counted. Fortunately, I had enough time to do that before voting day. These days, I make sure to vote the day I get the ballot just in case it is rejected. I am also more diligent about penmanship when sealing the envelope. How many mailed votes are rejected over such trivia when there is insufficient time to appeal? Lots, I bet.