Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robert B. Hubbell's avatar

Hi, Thom. Thanks for including all of the facts about a Convention of the States, many of which are omitted in discussions of such a convention.

Importantly, as you note, amendments to the Constitution require ratification of by thirty-eight (38) state legislatures. Given current partisan control of state legislatures (28R/19D/2split), that would mean that ten (10) legislatures CONTROLLED BY DEMOCRATS would need to approve any amendment in order for it to become effective. See State Partisan Composition (ncsl.org).

Thus, the ratification requirement gives Democrats iron-clad control over which amendments from a "rogue" Convention of the States would become part of the Constitution.

I believe that any discussion of the effort to call a Convention of the States should highlight the need for approval from ten Democratically controlled state legislatures to ratify an amendment.

The ratification discussion is frequently confused with the threshold for convening a Convention of States, which is 34. Convening the convention is not enough to enact amendments. Any proposed amendment would still require ratification by 38 states, which would require ratification by 10 state legislatures controlled by Democrats.

Expand full comment
Judith Green's avatar

How ironic: "generic" calls for constitutional changes dating back to 1789 are receiving major billionaire promotion toward legitimacy in order to dismantle democracy, while the 1972 Equal Rights Amendment, which as of 2020 has been ratified by 38 states, is not being accepted (the process took too long!) despite its democracy-strengthening impact.

Expand full comment
29 more comments...

No posts