Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SuZieCoyote's avatar

I don't see a way out; it is already too late. Politicians (and judges) are blatant in their corruption and when caught out, they just laugh at us. Look at Judge Canon, for example, could she be any more blatantly pro-Trump (and anti law?) The damage done by Trump's SCOTUS will never be acknowledged by the right and they are there for the long haul. Democrats REFUSE to even consider expanding the court, as they should do, for balance. The court (IMO) should have one justice from each state. Why not?

Oligarchs own all the levers of power and most of the media. I've watched stalwarts, such as WaPo and NYTimes take hard right turns over this past year. Citizens have no rights, except the right to buy stuff, with their stagnant wages, from the oligarchs. If they can take the right to physical autonomy from half the country, with very little real resistance in many quarters, they can do anything else they want. Oligarchs never give up power until the pitchforks come out. Even then, their resources allow them to weather the storms unscathed. They are psychotic devourers, mad with their ravenous greed. Republicans use propaganda and angertainment to control the population and when that fails (circus only works until the bread runs out), they will use force. That's the "logic" behind Trump's proposed gulags.

The 2024 election will tell the tale. If Trump and his minions prevail, we're done. It's back to the medieval model of lords and serfs (TBH, we are pretty much there.) Yet, even if Democrats prevail, I don't have a lot of faith in the Democrats to address any of our most pressing problems. Imagine for a moment, they have all three branches of government. What can they do that can't be stopped by the extremist SCOTUS? They may want to address the issues, but SCOTUS has ensured they must be on the take as well, or they will never hold office.

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

The names of the majority in the Citizens United v FEC need to be listed individually not merely as a whole. Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Feckless John Roberts, intellectual anchor Antonin Scalia, and Anthony Kennedy. All this insane reasoning emanated from the Lewis Powell memorandum and his decision in First National Bank v Belotti - which arguably provided the template for Citizens United v FEC. Names are relevant.

Expand full comment
38 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?