Chapter 3 The Triggerman: J.C. Bancroft Davis

Your weekly excerpt from one of my books. This week: "Who Killed the American Dream: The Greatest Political Crime Ever Told"

Who Killed the American Dream? Over the next few months the entire book will be here, new chapters posted every Sunday, for subscribers to read at no cost. If you want to get a physical book to mark up or share with others, just click on the picture above, visit your local bookstore, or check your favorite online seller.

Chapter 3 The Triggerman: J.C. Bancroft Davis

Who was J.C. Bancroft Davis? And why would he commit such an audacious fraud?

The answer lies in his connections to the railroad oligarchs, his own ambitions within America’s elite power structure, and—most importantly—whose interests he was really serving when he wrote that fraudulent headnote.

Davis wasn’t just helping the Southern Pacific Railroad win a tax case. He was helping an entire class of oligarchs acquire a constitutional weapon they could use against democracy itself, against the Progressive Era reforms that threatened their power, against the labor movement that demanded dignity for workers, and ultimately against every democratic effort to build what would later be called the American Dream.

The Court Reporter

John Chandler Bancroft Davis was born into privilege in 1822. His father was a prominent Massachusetts politician. Young Bancroft—he went by his middle name—attended Harvard, studied law, and entered a career that would take him through journalism, diplomacy, and ultimately to the Supreme Court.

By 1883, when he became the Supreme Court’s Reporter of Decisions, Davis was sixty-one years old. He’d served as Assistant Secretary of State, negotiated treaties, argued cases before the Supreme Court, and moved comfortably in the highest circles of American power.

He was also heavily invested in railroads, and had briefly been the president of a small railroad on the east coast.

Davis owned railroad stock, had financial relationships with railroad companies, and his social circle included railroad executives and oligarchs. When he took the job as Supreme Court Reporter, he brought those connections with him.

The Reporter’s job was supposed to be purely administrative: record the decisions, write brief summaries, publish the volumes. It wasn’t supposed to involve making law.

But Davis saw an opportunity.

A Man of His Class

To understand Davis, you have to understand the world he inhabited. The 1880s were the Gilded Age, a time when a small number of oligarchs controlled vast portions of America’s wealth while most workers lived in poverty, children labored in factories, women had no rights or political power, and democratic governance was routinely corrupted by corporate money.

Davis moved in the circles of those oligarchs. He dined with them. He invested with them. He shared their worldview: that property rights were sacred, that democratic regulation was tyranny, that the wealthy deserved protection from the masses.

This wasn’t unusual for men of his class. What was unusual, though, was his position. As the Supreme Court’s official reporter, Davis had access to the official record of constitutional law. He could shape how decisions were understood, cited, and applied.

And the railroad oligarchs and their man on the Court, Stephen J. Field, needed someone in exactly that position. Whether they recruited him explicitly or whether he simply understood what was expected of a man in his station, Davis delivered.

The Mysterious Letter

In 1886, after writing his fraudulent headnote but before publication, Davis wrote to Chief Justice Morrison Waite. The letter has been preserved in Waite’s papers at the Library of Congress, and I don’t think anybody had seen it in a century before I initiated an investigation and discovered it in a dust-covered file.

Davis wrote: “I have a memorandum in the California Cases Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co. as follows. In opening, the Court stated that it did not wish to hear argument on the question whether the Fourteenth Amendment applies to such corporations as are parties in these suits. All the Judges were of the opinion that it does.”

Davis was asking Waite to confirm that his summary was accurate, that Waite had indeed announced from the bench that corporations were persons under the Fourteenth Amendment, and that all the justices agreed.

Waite’s response, also preserved in his papers, is remarkable.

Waite wrote back: “I think your mem. in the California Railroad Tax cases expresses with sufficient accuracy what was said before the argument began. I leave it with you to determine whether anything need be said about it in the report inasmuch as we avoided meeting the constitutional question in the decision.”

And there it is. Waite confirmed that something was said before argument began, but he also noted that the Court “avoided meeting the constitutional question in the decision.”

In other words, even if Waite made some random comment before oral arguments began (and we’ll examine whether he really did in a moment), the Court’s actual decision explicitly did not rule on corporate constitutional rights other than to reject them as the basis for a decision.

Waite wrote that he left it to Davis “to determine whether anything need be said about it [the corporate constitutional rights argument] in the report.” That’s a remarkable delegation of authority. The Chief Justice was letting the court reporter decide what to include in the official record.

And Davis took that opportunity to include in his headnote the bizarre claim that the Court had ruled on corporate constitutional rights, even though the decision itself said no such thing.

What Actually Happened?

Did Waite really make that announcement before oral arguments? Did all the justices really agree that corporations were persons?

The historical evidence suggests neither occurred.

First, there’s no record of such an announcement in the official transcript of oral arguments.

Second, the decision itself contradicts it. If all the justices agreed that corporations were persons and thus entitled to the protections of the Fourteenth Amendment, why would Justice Harlan write that “it is not necessary to consider” that question? Why would the Court avoid the issue entirely?

Third, no other justices left any record whatsoever of agreeing to such a radical position. We have their papers, their letters, their other opinions, and none of them suggest they believed at that time that corporations were constitutional persons for purposes of Fourteenth Amendment protections.

And fourth, the timing is suspicious. If Waite had actually made this announcement in the context Davis was suggesting, it would have been big news. Contemporary newspaper accounts of the case don’t mention it, and legal commentators at the time didn’t note it. It only appears in Davis’s headnote, which was written months after the decision as Waite lay sick and dying from heart failure.

The most likely explanation is that Waite had said something to that effect about corporations being a kind of artificial person. As Blackstone noted a century earlier and Delmas quoted, it’s true that corporations have some constitutional rights: they need legal standing to own property, pay taxes, open bank accounts, be held responsible under the law, and so on, and that’s been recognized by the Supreme Court going all the way back to the Dartmouth v. Woodward decision in 1819.

But the artificial person that’s a corporation is an entirely different thing from the “natural persons” the Fourteenth Amendment was written to protect. So, it’s possible that Waite was simply acknowledging Dartmouth, if he did make that comment or something close to it.

Thus, either Davis manufactured the claim or he mischaracterized something Waite said. Either way, Davis put it in the official record as if corporations having rights similar to humans was now established law.

And because Davis was the official reporter, because his headnote appeared in United States Reports, because nobody had reason to doubt it, the fraud succeeded.

The Motive

This raises the inevitable questions: Why would Davis do this? What did he gain?

The answer is most likely found in the gilded world of 1880s America, where oligarchs lavishly rewarded those who best served their interests, much as Trump does today with his corporate donors when they bring him gifts and donations.

Railroad stock holdings would increase in value if railroads gained constitutional protections from taxation and regulation, and Davis owned railroad stock (he’d even briefly been president of a regional railroad). He had friends who owned railroad stock, and the headnote served their interests directly.

But there was likely more to it than just money. Men like Davis operated in what were then referred to by social scientists as “networks of mutual benefit.” Today we call it naked corruption. Back in those days, they simply called it “the way business gets done.” You helped the railroad oligarchs, they helped you—financially, politically, and even socially.

Thus, Davis didn’t need to be offered a direct bribe. He knew which side his bread was buttered on. Writing a headnote that served railroad interests cost him nothing and potentially gained him much.

It was the perfect crime: invisible, deniable, and enormously profitable for everyone except the American working class and the future generations that Reagan and the GOP would crush using Davis’s headnote.

Serving the Oligarch Class

It also turns out that Davis’s fraud served interests far beyond the Southern Pacific Railroad’s tax case. He wasn’t just helping one corporation avoid property taxes; he helped an entire oligarchic class acquire a weapon they could use against democracy for generations to come.

Consider what the oligarchs faced in 1886. The labor movement was growing. The Knights of Labor had just reached peak membership and became the largest union in world history. Strikes were spreading across industries. Workers were demanding the eight-hour day, a living wage, and safer working conditions.

States were beginning to seriously regulate corporations by setting safety standards, limiting working hours, and requiring fair treatment of workers. Farmers were organizing against railroad and processor monopolies. Reformers were demanding antitrust laws to break up corporate consolidation, and the newspapers were all over it.

The First Progressive Era was dawning, and everything the oligarchs had built through corruption, exploitation, and ruthless business practices was, in their minds, under threat.

What they needed was more than a simple court victory in one tax case: they needed a constitutional principle they could use to fight back against democratic governance itself. They wanted to be able to claim that common-sense regulations violated their constitutional rights, that taxes were unconstitutional “takings” as defined by the Fifth Amendment, and that the labor protections FDR would later codify into law infringed on their constitutional rights.

Corporate constitutional rights gave them exactly that and more.

With Davis’s fraudulent headnote established as precedent, corporations could claim Fourteenth Amendment protections, such as “due process” rights. They could claim to be the victims of “unequal protection” prohibited by that Amendment when states tried to treat them differently from human beings.

Davis handed the oligarchs a constitutional weapon that they’d use for the next 140 years to fight against every democratic effort to build and protect the American Dream.

The Accomplice

But John Chandler Bancroft Davis didn’t act alone. He had an accomplice on the Supreme Court itself: Justice Stephen J. Field.

Field was more than just sympathetic to corporate interests; he was a true believer in corporate constitutional rights. He’d been advocating for them in dissents and concurrences on behalf of the railroad oligarchs in California for years.

Justice Field and Court Reporter Davis knew each other well. They moved in the same elite social and political circles. They shared the same ideology: that property rights were sacred and democratic attempts to regulate corporations were tyrannical.

Justice Field had been waiting for the right case to establish corporate constitutional rights, and Santa Clara looked promising. But when the majority decided to rule on narrow technical grounds instead of reaching the constitutional question, Field’s opportunity slipped away.

Or did it?

Reporter Davis’s headnote accomplished what Justice Field couldn’t achieve through the Court’s decision. It established corporate constitutional rights in the official record, where future courts would cite it as precedent.

Did Justice Field encourage Davis to write the fraudulent headnote? Did they coordinate? The historical record doesn’t prove conspiracy, but it shows opportunity, motive, and benefit.

What we know for certain is that Justice Field welcomed the headnote’s impact. In later cases, he cited gleefully Santa Clara as establishing corporate constitutional rights, and he never corrected the record. He never bothered to say, “Wait, that’s not what we decided.”

The silence of accomplices often speaks loudly.

The Perfect Crime

By the time anyone might have noticed the fraud, it was too late. Less than four months after joining the Court in 1937, Justice Hugo Black issued a dissenting opinion in Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Johnson, writing:

I do not believe the word “person” in the Fourteenth Amendment includes corporations. . . . ​Certainly, when the Fourteenth Amendment was submitted for approval, the people were not told that the states . . . ​ratified an amendment granting new and revolutionary rights to corporations.

This amendment sought to prevent discrimination by the states against classes or races. . . . ​Yet, of the cases in this Court in which the Fourteenth Amendment was applied during the first fifty years after its adoption, less than one-half of 1 percent invoked it in protection of the Negro race, and more than 50 percent asked that its benefits be extended to corporations.

Courts subsequent to the publication of Davis’s case summary had already relied on the headnote, so the precedent was established. Unwinding it would require admitting that the Supreme Court’s official reporter had committed fraud and that generations of lawyers and judges had been fooled.

Nobody associated with the Supreme Court, and certainly nobody in corporate America, wanted to admit that.

So, the fraud has stood for a century and a half. It became law through repetition. By 1890, just four years after Santa Clara, even the Supreme Court itself was citing the headnote as if it were the decision.

The perfect crime isn’t one that’s never discovered: it’s the one where discovery of it changes nothing, where the damage is already done, and where correcting the fraud would be more embarrassing or difficult than living with it.

Davis committed the perfect crime. The railroad oligarchs benefited tremendously, as do massive corporations and their billionaire owners today, but American democracy and the working class paid the price.

The Long Shadow of the Triggerman

Court Reporter J.C. Bancroft Davis died in 1907, twenty-one years after writing the fraudulent headnote that reshaped American democracy. He never faced consequences for what he did, was never investigated, prosecuted, or even publicly questioned about it.

He probably died believing he’d done nothing wrong, or at least nothing that men of his class and position didn’t routinely do. Helping the oligarchs was simply what one did back then; it was how the system worked.

But the shadow of his fraud now stretches across more than a century:

Every time a corporation claims First Amendment rights to spend unlimited money on elections, it’s Davis’s fraud.

Every time a corporation claims due process rights to block environmental regulations, it’s Davis’s fraud.

Every time a corporation claims equal protection to avoid taxes that fund schools, roads, and public services, it’s Davis’s fraud.

Every time a corporation claims religious freedom to deny employees healthcare coverage, it’s Davis’s fraud.

Every time a corporation prevents the EPA from investigating their pollution by citing the Fourth Amendment right to privacy, it’s Davis’s fraud.

The American middle class that Reaganomics shrank from 66 percent in 1981 to 43 percent today was crushed under Davis’s fraud.

The fifty-plus trillion dollars transferred from working Americans into billionaires’ money bins since the Reagan Revolution was enabled by Davis’s fraud.

The student debt, the healthcare bankruptcies, the housing crisis, the stagnant wages, the dying American Dream: all were made possible by that single fraudulent sentence written by a court reporter serving the railroad oligarchs’ interests in 1886.

Digging one level deeper, however, we find that while Davis was the triggerman, he was also apparently working for someone else. To understand the full scope of the conspiracy, we must understand its mastermind: Justice Stephen J. Field.