I tried to edit the wikipedia pages for Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon to include their treason. The edits included citations from reliable secondary sources, and were immediately reverted by right wing partisans who act as gate keepers.
Each article has a talk page, a tab on the upper left, anyone can click on the tab and see conversati…
I tried to edit the wikipedia pages for Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon to include their treason. The edits included citations from reliable secondary sources, and were immediately reverted by right wing partisans who act as gate keepers.
Each article has a talk page, a tab on the upper left, anyone can click on the tab and see conversations between editors . Anyone can edit Wikipedia, they just need to be aware of policy and guidelines and follow them
One policy is "no revert wars", in other words I can revert and edit, and if that revert is reverted then a revert war starts. Problem is that some editors are embedded or have friends with the volunteer staff that monitors editor behavior.
The odds are in favor of the person that reverts your edit, otherwise there is a long drawn out discussion, and don't call out your antagonist(s) for what they are, you will be blocked from posting, you are suppose to assume good faith. Even though everything that they say about a subject is paltering.
I tried to edit the wikipedia pages for Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon to include their treason. The edits included citations from reliable secondary sources, and were immediately reverted by right wing partisans who act as gate keepers.
Each article has a talk page, a tab on the upper left, anyone can click on the tab and see conversations between editors . Anyone can edit Wikipedia, they just need to be aware of policy and guidelines and follow them
One policy is "no revert wars", in other words I can revert and edit, and if that revert is reverted then a revert war starts. Problem is that some editors are embedded or have friends with the volunteer staff that monitors editor behavior.
The odds are in favor of the person that reverts your edit, otherwise there is a long drawn out discussion, and don't call out your antagonist(s) for what they are, you will be blocked from posting, you are suppose to assume good faith. Even though everything that they say about a subject is paltering.
Thanks, a new concern the Judge hearing this is Aileen Cannon, the same Trump humper that appointed a special master and was finally overruled.
I hope that the 11th circuit takes igt out of her hands.