OK I made that post after checking the roll call vote. So why did she vote no on 150.?
I don't know. It apparently failed on that take so there must have been a fatal flaw in the wording. I was so shocked by reading your post that I was compelled to look it up. It would not be like her to vote against it. She has my support.
She had my support as well, until I found that vote. I don't think there was a flaw in the wording because it showed the entire roll call for that vote., however when I did a search this time I found this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2024/04/20/ukraine-israel-border-funding-house-vote/
I guess I will support Susan, I wish she was open to comments by people outside her constituency.
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
OK I made that post after checking the roll call vote. So why did she vote no on 150.?
I don't know. It apparently failed on that take so there must have been a fatal flaw in the wording. I was so shocked by reading your post that I was compelled to look it up. It would not be like her to vote against it. She has my support.
She had my support as well, until I found that vote. I don't think there was a flaw in the wording because it showed the entire roll call for that vote., however when I did a search this time I found this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2024/04/20/ukraine-israel-border-funding-house-vote/
I guess I will support Susan, I wish she was open to comments by people outside her constituency.