Is the Trump–Epstein Scandal Nearing the Critical Mass that Turned "Watergate" Into a White House Collapse?
The coverup is widening, the documents are missing, and history suggests the collapse comes faster than anyone expects…
We’ve only had one genuinely failed presidency in the modern era: Richard Nixon’s. I believe we’re on the verge of the second, and for very similar reasons. If it plays out the way I expect, the consequences could be world-changing, and will certainly alter how our politics work for decades to come.
The tipping point began in a big way when Attorney General Pam Bondi went before Congress to defend Trump. When asked how many of Epstein’s co-conspirators she’d indicted, she refused to answer and instead completely lost it, going off on a bizarre rant that included:
“Donald Trump signed that law to release all of those documents. He is the most transparent president in the nation’s history. None of them asked Merrick Garland over the last four years one word about Jeffrey Epstein.
“Donald Trump — The Dow — the Dow right now is over 50,000. The S&P at almost 7,000 and the Nasdaq smashing records. Americans’ 401(k)s and retirement savings are booming. That’s what we should be talking about.”
Nobody was buying it any more than when Trump said on Wednesday of this week, “I’ve been totally exonerated. I did nothing.” Instead, both became punch lines for comedians and have Republicans hiding to avoid being interviewed.
And yesterday we saw the bookend of this Watergate-like tipping point, when the former Prince Andrew was arrested by the British police. They didn’t even give the royal family an advance notice, didn’t invite him to come and be questioned, but instead just showed up and took him away, then tore apart his residences looking for evidence.
Consider the analogy.
The Watergate scandal that brought Nixon down began in June of 1972, but Nixon didn’t resigned until August, 1974. It crossed over his re-election in November, 1972, and was barely a factor, just like Epstein was only a footnote to Trump’s election in 2024. For over two years, most Americans thought Watergate was overblown.
Early reporting in the mainstream media largely dismissed the initial furor of Democrats over their headquarters’ offices being broken into as partisan huffing and puffing, because almost nobody thought Nixon himself had anything to do with the crime.
Conservative media at the time ridiculed Democrats’ concerns as political opportunism, calling the event — as Nixon himself said — “A third-rate burglary.” The legal system was largely disinterested, beyond holding the burglars themselves to account for a crime where it wasn’t clear that anything was even taken from the offices.
And the Nixon administration — and his Department of Justice and its leader, Attorney General John Mitchell — ridiculed both politicians and media folks who expressed concern that Watergate represented an actual threat to our constitutional system of government.
What changed when the tapes were finally released (analogous to the release of 3 million documents by the DOJ and Bondi’s evasive testimony) was that Americans finally realized that the president was, in fact, “a crook” and that the institutions of the federal government — particularly the DOJ — had been covering up for him.
We’re damn close to that moment now.
The recent DOJ release included reference to a report that a 13-15-year old girl reported to the FBI that Donald Trump beat her up when she bit his penis as he forced her to perform oral sex; this week reporter Roger Sollenberger found that she was interviewed at least 4 times by the FBI and those more in-depth interviews (case number 3501.045) have mysteriously gone entirely missing from the documents released by Patel and Bondi.
The story made a headline on the conservative news site Drudge Report, among others; this mirrors the period immediately before Nixon resigned when rightwing sites and elected Republicans stopped publicly defending him.
Nixon fell when institutional America and the GOP stopped speaking out in his defense. It wasn’t just the break-in or the hush money he paid the burglars that broke the dam; it was when the elite consensus turned on him.
Late in the evening on August 7th, 1974, three Republican leaders — Barry Goldwater, Hugh Scott, and John Rhodes — walked over to the White House and told President Nixon that the evidence against him had accumulated beyond spin, loyalty, and even partisan defense. The center of gravity had shifted, and two days later he was gone.
I’m not suggesting Trump is losing his presidency this week or next; after all, Watergate took over two years and Nixon didn’t have Fox “News” or 1,500 rightwing radio stations or Vladimir Putin and Elon Musk churning social media on his behalf. Trump has a much more powerful firewall than Nixon ever dreamed of. It may sustain him for months or even another year.
And, as president, he has a lot of tools at his disposal to keep changing the subject, which is where these revelations about Trump could become “world changing” if he comes sufficiently desperate.
A war with Iran appears to be his latest gambit. During Watergate, Nixon’s aides developed what they called a “modified limited hangout,” a strategy not of disproving the scandal but of suffocating it in the media by overwhelming the public with competing announcements, threats, events, and crises.
Nonetheless, while Americans will tolerate misconduct, abuse of office to escape accountability is an entirely different animal. And raping children is a much bigger deal than breaking into the DNC; Nixon didn’t even participate, he just gave the orders and supervised the cover-up. Trump, on the other hand, appears to be right in the middle of Epstein’s operation, perhaps even including his teen modeling agency and Miss Teen USA pageant.
It’s a cliché that “the coverup is worse than the crime,” but they keep doing it.
And now it’s metastasizing beyond Epstein.
Bondi and Patel insisting the Epstein investigation is now closed. Kristi Noem and Kash Patel refusing to give Minnesota police evidence in the murders of Renee Good and Alex Pretti. ICE defying over 4,400 court orders and refusing members of Congress or the press entrance to their brutal concentration camps. Trump going after the FBI agents who uncovered Putin’s efforts to make him president in 2016. He and his family making $4 billion off his presidency in less than a year. Trump sucking up to Putin.
Trump’s level of criminality and corruption exceeds Nixon’s by orders of magnitude.
The coverups were why Nixon’s Attorney General John Mitchell went to prison, as did his Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman, his Assistant for Domestic Affairs John Ehrlichman, his Special Counsel Charles Colson, and his White House Counsel John Dean (who’s since been a frequent guest on my radio/TV program).
That has to be waking Pam Bondi and others around Trump up at night. And it should be giving pause to every elected Republican facing the November midterms.
Every Watergate moment looks impossible right up until the hour it becomes inevitable. And when that hour arrives, it never feels sudden to those who carefully read history; only to the people who insisted, until the very end, that it could never happen here.
Louise’s Daily Song: “Gathering Storm”
The song that was inspired by this article is here.
My reading this article as an audio podcast is here.
My newest book, The Last American President: A Broken Man, a Corrupt Party, and a World on the Brink is now available in bookstores nationwide.
You can follow me on Blue Sky here: https://bsky.app/profile/thomhartmann.bsky.social



Years ago, I learned of the "18-month rule" from an incredibly driven and insightful CEO. This idea is that the blowback from changes comes home to roost after about 18 months. It absolutely happened with Watergate, and I have seen it play out multiple times in my corporate world. It's playing out now with this administration.
With that in mind, it is time to rethink the Imperial Presidency and drive towards significant change towards a true parliamentary government. Plenty of models out there, and it's time to move.
I suggest that a person who can't follow the train of thought laid out on his teleprompter, is long past planning what's going on. You wrote, "Trump ... has a lot of tools at his disposal ...." I suspect you don't want to start making public statements about who is behind all of this, (good move, no doubt) but I'm long past the notion that Trump is leading anything any more. He is a rallying figure, I agree, but a "Leader"? More like a meme, perhaps?