If you're not interested in the conspiracy to steal the election, and associated false statements, perjury and criminal conduct by the highest-level members of the White House, then I agree - there is no need to read the indictment.
You also wouldn't be interested in news from legitimate sources about how the doj opened hundreds of cases …
If you're not interested in the conspiracy to steal the election, and associated false statements, perjury and criminal conduct by the highest-level members of the White House, then I agree - there is no need to read the indictment.
You also wouldn't be interested in news from legitimate sources about how the doj opened hundreds of cases while the doj supposedly dithered.
I have read, am interested by that is beside the point, I won't let you turn the question, by turning it back on me.
You said in a previous post, that all people want to do is to get their info from the TV, and haven't read the indictment. I have read the indictment, so what is so significant. TV news readers and host, simply do a Readers Digest of the Indicment.
If you're not interested in the conspiracy to steal the election, and associated false statements, perjury and criminal conduct by the highest-level members of the White House, then I agree - there is no need to read the indictment.
You also wouldn't be interested in news from legitimate sources about how the doj opened hundreds of cases while the doj supposedly dithered.
Pathetic, really.
https://www.npr.org/2021/01/12/956145727/doj-opens-nearly-200-cases-into-pro-trump-riot-on-capitol-hill
I have read, am interested by that is beside the point, I won't let you turn the question, by turning it back on me.
You said in a previous post, that all people want to do is to get their info from the TV, and haven't read the indictment. I have read the indictment, so what is so significant. TV news readers and host, simply do a Readers Digest of the Indicment.