Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Oldandintheway's avatar

Mr. Hartman, you are a lawyer, and you understand that for over 200 years the Constitution was the basic law of the land and described in some detail, but not completely, how our government should function. The courts, especially the Supreme Court, took on the role of deciding what that meant. There have been widely differing opinions over the years, but this last decision by the 6 extremist justices, which they released after a great delay, and then ran out of town, seems to me, a layman, like something that has no basis in the US Constitution.

In order to give the president such total immunity to do anything he wishes while in office, and not being held accountable afterwards seems as if it would need a Constitutional Amendment. The court can’t just declare the document wrong, just because they will be well paid to do so. Do other judges have to follow this unconstitutional ruling? Can Judge Chutkan say that according to the law, Trump has been indicted for several crimes and it is up to a jury, not the Supreme Court ( or even the judge in Florida) to decide if he is guilty or not?

Isn’t it finally time to organize 1,000,000 lawyers, and 20,000 judges to say that they will no longer follow the corrosive opinions handed down by this court. Unless some opposition imposes reform there will be blood in the streets as people protect their freedom. We don’t want or need a second revolution to install a completely corrupt government .

Expand full comment
Daniel Solomon's avatar

They are trying to divide us to conquer us...and it works.

Whereas all SCOTUS members had said at confirmation hearings and in prior decisions that the United States does not have a king, they crowned the degenerate four times indicted, 34 times convicted of 34 state felonies, still faced with many other crimes charged in state and federal court, as King Don I.

It was as if he had not lost the last election. They granted King Don absolute immunity for “core” duties, even when there is no basis for it in the text of the Constitution.

There can be no further appeal. Plus, this term, the court decided to take control of agency rulemaking, despite fifth amendment due process and the language of the Administrative Procedure Act.

They haven’t fully expressed their logic, except that they believe it is their prerogative to make law.

I can’t prove it, but I think the logic is just human nature, if not animal behavior.

Once upon a time, I spent several years listening to judges at many levels who in essence privately admitted that they achieved their positions through divine right. We used to discuss it in my Inns of Court, where judges from all levels spoke openly. Many “entitled” circuit court judges crap on certain district court judges. District court judges on magistrates. A majority of district court judges in Miami would have abolished bankruptcy courts to have direct authority over filers. District court judges nationally crap on decisions from the Social Security Administrative law judges. Within the agency, resentment and hostility became so bad that the judges organized and received collective bargaining status. The agency had a “non-acquisition” policy, meaning they would not accept the decisions of circuit court judges as precedent.

I attribute the logic to the majority belief in pseudoscientific theories and societal practices that purport to apply biological concepts of natural selection and survival of the fittest to sociology, economics and politics. For example, Alito and Thomas often refer to “natural law” as the basis for decisions. Natural law for them is Catholic dogma on such matters as abortion, contraception, marriage, etc.

Most of this “antisocial” conduct comes “naturally.”

But without parties in litigation, even with Article II, section 2 and Article III of the Constitution, there would be no courts. As a matter of biology, without guppies, the bigger fish would not survive.

It’s reasonable to expect that if King Don is elected, this time he will assert a core duty to fish the judicial system as he sees fit.

When the times are tough, the tough get going. We need to be better than the insurrectionists, their aiders, abettors apologists. Regardless of outcome, internal doubts, anxieties, we need to out register and out vote them despite the media blitz.. Uncle Sam needs us to step up.

https://www.fieldteam6.org/

Expand full comment
65 more comments...

No posts