LOL. On Quora I posted a comment about the Brits having a longing for the good ole days of serfdom, and their willingness to finance and die for the benefit of their "betters"
Read slowly the words of "God save the King", may he reign over us. Talk of brainwashed.
His response was, come over here and say that, and you will enjoy the benefi…
LOL. On Quora I posted a comment about the Brits having a longing for the good ole days of serfdom, and their willingness to finance and die for the benefit of their "betters"
Read slowly the words of "God save the King", may he reign over us. Talk of brainwashed.
His response was, come over here and say that, and you will enjoy the benefits of National Healthcare.
Now I am all in favor of single payer, but not government run healthcare, if England is an example, you can die in the waiting room, it is shoddy and mismanaged, The result of anything with an elite group of managers, like corporations, are involved.In America it is non profits, especially community run, like Evergreen in Kirkland, WA that run a great medical center, because they are close to the community.
In NW Washington and in Oregon, there are Peace Health medical centers, founded by the nuns of St Joseph, they are also great, save that they are opposed to abortions and medically assisted euthanasia. Then again they have contracted out a lot of their services to Blackrock.. Blackrock is the Redock in the Resident, the company that tried to buy Chastain Memorial, before the doctors and the board decided to give it to the local government.
Medical centers are above par, if owned by the local government, but distance between the Center and its management, as in England is subpar, because of distance and lack of community involvement. And that is why England''s National Institute of Health is problematic.,layers of cost cutting bureaucrats whose sole motivation is their own careers.
Doctors, nurses, techs and staff do the best they can within parameters of financial restraints. It doesn't happen in America to non profits, run by communities, fewer bureaucrats and minus the profit motive.
And that is why I support Bernie's single payor idea, not socialize national health care run by political appointees.
I can totally agree with you about England and the Health System. For years it has floundered under continual Conservative Prime Ministers.
I don't think this would have been the case if there had been a Labour Govt. but I don't know for sure.
The medical system in France remains really good (except for a shortage of Doctors) which is causing many problems.
I have been in Hospitals in the USA and France.
France is so much better.
When in Hospital in the US I needed a major 'op and had to wait a day before my Insurance Company decided to put me in Hospital. The ward was understaffed partiicularly at night + I had to pay for a sick bowl and other things!
LOL. On Quora I posted a comment about the Brits having a longing for the good ole days of serfdom, and their willingness to finance and die for the benefit of their "betters"
Read slowly the words of "God save the King", may he reign over us. Talk of brainwashed.
His response was, come over here and say that, and you will enjoy the benefits of National Healthcare.
Now I am all in favor of single payer, but not government run healthcare, if England is an example, you can die in the waiting room, it is shoddy and mismanaged, The result of anything with an elite group of managers, like corporations, are involved.In America it is non profits, especially community run, like Evergreen in Kirkland, WA that run a great medical center, because they are close to the community.
In NW Washington and in Oregon, there are Peace Health medical centers, founded by the nuns of St Joseph, they are also great, save that they are opposed to abortions and medically assisted euthanasia. Then again they have contracted out a lot of their services to Blackrock.. Blackrock is the Redock in the Resident, the company that tried to buy Chastain Memorial, before the doctors and the board decided to give it to the local government.
Medical centers are above par, if owned by the local government, but distance between the Center and its management, as in England is subpar, because of distance and lack of community involvement. And that is why England''s National Institute of Health is problematic.,layers of cost cutting bureaucrats whose sole motivation is their own careers.
Doctors, nurses, techs and staff do the best they can within parameters of financial restraints. It doesn't happen in America to non profits, run by communities, fewer bureaucrats and minus the profit motive.
And that is why I support Bernie's single payor idea, not socialize national health care run by political appointees.
I can totally agree with you about England and the Health System. For years it has floundered under continual Conservative Prime Ministers.
I don't think this would have been the case if there had been a Labour Govt. but I don't know for sure.
The medical system in France remains really good (except for a shortage of Doctors) which is causing many problems.
I have been in Hospitals in the USA and France.
France is so much better.
When in Hospital in the US I needed a major 'op and had to wait a day before my Insurance Company decided to put me in Hospital. The ward was understaffed partiicularly at night + I had to pay for a sick bowl and other things!