And that gives away the real reason for their opposition to abortion. They don’t care about the “babies”, and they never did (we know that, because they refuse to do anything to support them once they’re born).
It’s extramarital sex that they want to stop, because their religion tells them it’s wrong.
And that gives away the real reason for their opposition to abortion. They don’t care about the “babies”, and they never did (we know that, because they refuse to do anything to support them once they’re born).
It’s extramarital sex that they want to stop, because their religion tells them it’s wrong.
Not extra marital sex, because the right wingers are frequently exposed as perverts, adulterers, and even given standing ovations when they enter the Congress after being exposed.
It is about male hegemony, the patriarchy, and the root is psychosexual, these are pseudo men, they have the genitalia, but can't get aroused and thus copulate unless they are in complete control of a submissive woman. Quick example, rapists and InCels.
Insecure right wing males, and totally secure liberal males. Look at their hero's and agenda.
John Wayne and gun fetish v. Sidney Poitier and gun control
Pretty much, except not just extramarital, but any female sexuality. It was a revelation to me when my Mom began yelling "sluts!" at the TV re: abortion. She bought hook, line and sinker that "sluts" were using abortion as routine birth control. That was long before Mifeprestone, so we're talking about a world-view that depraved, predatory females were getting themselves scooped out regularly so they could be promiscuous. So you are absolutely right: never mind about "life at conception" or "babies." Just punish the "sluts."
I agree, it is apparent that Dana read your comment with cerebral filters, that is a too frequent occurrence on comment pages. If you go to lengths to explain clearly what you meant, it becomes TL:DR, and the reader loses interest.
A very frequent occurrence is the person that reads an article or comment, basically looking for something that will trigger them, or when the read that offending (to their eyes) sentence the eyes and mind stops reading.
You said whore and apparently that was a trigger word, the rest of your comment was read with inflamed sensibilities that inhibited a rational and calmer response.
“STONE ALL THE WHORES”
And that gives away the real reason for their opposition to abortion. They don’t care about the “babies”, and they never did (we know that, because they refuse to do anything to support them once they’re born).
It’s extramarital sex that they want to stop, because their religion tells them it’s wrong.
Not extra marital sex, because the right wingers are frequently exposed as perverts, adulterers, and even given standing ovations when they enter the Congress after being exposed.
It is about male hegemony, the patriarchy, and the root is psychosexual, these are pseudo men, they have the genitalia, but can't get aroused and thus copulate unless they are in complete control of a submissive woman. Quick example, rapists and InCels.
Insecure right wing males, and totally secure liberal males. Look at their hero's and agenda.
John Wayne and gun fetish v. Sidney Poitier and gun control
Pretty much, except not just extramarital, but any female sexuality. It was a revelation to me when my Mom began yelling "sluts!" at the TV re: abortion. She bought hook, line and sinker that "sluts" were using abortion as routine birth control. That was long before Mifeprestone, so we're talking about a world-view that depraved, predatory females were getting themselves scooped out regularly so they could be promiscuous. So you are absolutely right: never mind about "life at conception" or "babies." Just punish the "sluts."
That's pretty revealing, Ron Murray.
Then I probably didn’t say what you think I said.
I agree, it is apparent that Dana read your comment with cerebral filters, that is a too frequent occurrence on comment pages. If you go to lengths to explain clearly what you meant, it becomes TL:DR, and the reader loses interest.
A very frequent occurrence is the person that reads an article or comment, basically looking for something that will trigger them, or when the read that offending (to their eyes) sentence the eyes and mind stops reading.
You said whore and apparently that was a trigger word, the rest of your comment was read with inflamed sensibilities that inhibited a rational and calmer response.