Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeffrey Hobbs's avatar

I wonder if every headnote written by this one court clerk was so deliberately untrue to the text of the cases to which they were attached that they changed the whole spirit of several laws to the advantage of corporations. And how many lawyers and judges over the years have either lacked the diligence to read on further, or simply wanted to accept a short summary paragraph as fact because it was just what they were hoping to be true?

William Farrar's avatar

The head note is treated as a law, because corporations, including the media which pay the salaries of reporters,journalists and editors, have a vested interest.

Like a drowning man clinging to a straw, they grasped the head note in Santa Clara v Southern Pacific as a life saver.

Corporations, own corporations which own other corporations, like big fish,swallowing little fish

And in that regard the best way to understand the United States is as a corporation USA Inc.

The current CEO, is with the investors permission, utilizing the resources of the corporation for self aggrandizement, and they don't mind him wetting his beak, as he has proven to be very profitable for them

For instance, The Trump Netanyahu war against Iran, is hurting the corporate citizens, but it is enriching the :etrograchy. As our freedoms and personal liberty are diminished, the power and wealth of the Broligarchy is increased.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?