I wonder if every headnote written by this one court clerk was so deliberately untrue to the text of the cases to which they were attached that they changed the whole spirit of several laws to the advantage of corporations. And how many lawyers and judges over the years have either lacked the diligence to read on further, or simply wanted to accept a short summary paragraph as fact because it was just what they were hoping to be true?
The head note is treated as a law, because corporations, including the media which pay the salaries of reporters,journalists and editors, have a vested interest.
Like a drowning man clinging to a straw, they grasped the head note in Santa Clara v Southern Pacific as a life saver.
Corporations, own corporations which own other corporations, like big fish,swallowing little fish
And in that regard the best way to understand the United States is as a corporation USA Inc.
The current CEO, is with the investors permission, utilizing the resources of the corporation for self aggrandizement, and they don't mind him wetting his beak, as he has proven to be very profitable for them
For instance, The Trump Netanyahu war against Iran, is hurting the corporate citizens, but it is enriching the :etrograchy. As our freedoms and personal liberty are diminished, the power and wealth of the Broligarchy is increased.
Wow. What a bomb Thom has dropped here! I’m wondering whether some of this could be undone by top democracy defending lawyers like Marc Elias or Norm Eisen looking into this and bringing lawsuits to help undo the continued use of this case as precedent when it never really was a precedent at all?
I wonder if every headnote written by this one court clerk was so deliberately untrue to the text of the cases to which they were attached that they changed the whole spirit of several laws to the advantage of corporations. And how many lawyers and judges over the years have either lacked the diligence to read on further, or simply wanted to accept a short summary paragraph as fact because it was just what they were hoping to be true?
Iwish Thom had gone into detail about the identify of the clerk that wrote the head note.
As I recall from his earlier statements on his tV show,/ The clerk of the court was a former chief executive of a Rail road.
The head note is treated as a law, because corporations, including the media which pay the salaries of reporters,journalists and editors, have a vested interest.
Like a drowning man clinging to a straw, they grasped the head note in Santa Clara v Southern Pacific as a life saver.
Corporations, own corporations which own other corporations, like big fish,swallowing little fish
And in that regard the best way to understand the United States is as a corporation USA Inc.
The current CEO, is with the investors permission, utilizing the resources of the corporation for self aggrandizement, and they don't mind him wetting his beak, as he has proven to be very profitable for them
For instance, The Trump Netanyahu war against Iran, is hurting the corporate citizens, but it is enriching the :etrograchy. As our freedoms and personal liberty are diminished, the power and wealth of the Broligarchy is increased.
Wow. What a bomb Thom has dropped here! I’m wondering whether some of this could be undone by top democracy defending lawyers like Marc Elias or Norm Eisen looking into this and bringing lawsuits to help undo the continued use of this case as precedent when it never really was a precedent at all?
So what recourse do we have?