3. Use selective prosecution to punish those who speak out.
Well it isn't the Trump humpers who have monopolized this tactic.
Biden's DHS is still tracking progressives, and recently arrested protesters against Cop City being built in Atlanta, GA and they still expend resources on tracking progressive movements like antifa(scism)
3. Use selective prosecution to punish those who speak out.
Well it isn't the Trump humpers who have monopolized this tactic.
Biden's DHS is still tracking progressives, and recently arrested protesters against Cop City being built in Atlanta, GA and they still expend resources on tracking progressive movements like antifa(scism)
On June 3, 2017, while employed by the military contractor Pluribus International Corporation, Reality Winner was arrested on suspicion of leaking an intelligence report about Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections from the National Security Agency (NSA) to the news website The Intercept. She was arrested and imprisoned by Trump, yet she is still in prison. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_Winner
Then there was this dude who leaded info about a National Security (GESTAPO) state, he was forced to find safety in Russia, but did America a huge favor by disclosing this top secret neo GESTAPO government.
Ironically the same situation with Julian Assange, when he leaked info about the National Security State and DHS, he was hailed as a hero by liberals, until he worked with Putin to release Hillary's emails.
Then he became anathema to liberals. And he did so why, because Hillary had been trying to extradite him to America when Secretary of State.
So we have a history of "liberals" chasing after and condoning the persecution of people who expose the national security state, in this way Democrats become enablers of their own enemies.
And we have the treacherous right winger Christopher Wray running the FBI, and Trump humpers running or embedded in vital cabinets from DHS, to NSA, DOD and Customs and Border Patrol.
Trump gave Biden a tool which he could use to purge these departments of these tools, but revoked EO 13957, which created Schedule F civil servants from political appointees, with the first EO he signed EO 14002
So do I understand that we are to do nothing about fascism because some more aggressive "Liberals" are being watched for their illegal activities??
You cant start or win a revolution until even the Democratic haters fall into place with one camp, either the Magats or the Progressives as blue Dems.
Make a choice or step out of the way. Your obvious support for anyone other than "Blue" pols will get you your friends a fascist dictatorship sooner than later.
I would welcome your ideas for change as a blue supporter but not as a destructive critic. Just make a choice please.
Where in creation did you come up with that conclusion. You need to go back and take remedial in reading comprehension.
Actually you vindicate my concern, I am very, very progressive, but out worst enemies are within the blue house. The centrists, the conservadems, the compromisers, they always cede to the fascists, because they want everyone to like them., hence bipartisanship. We need the same power within the Democratic party as the fascists have in the Republican party, but we aren't going to get there with a center right core, which iis what we have. They might as well be Republicans.
I have trouble with putting Assange and Snowden in the same category as Daniel Ellsberg. For one thing, Daniel Ellsberg was willing to go to trial. He didn’t hide in an embassy or run to Russia. Someone who runs to Russia, the country which poisons dissidents and currently has a WSJ reporter in jail-isn’t a champion for free speech. Also, there is a difference between exposing wrong doing and putting one’s thumb on the scale to hurt a political candidate
I never even mentioned Ellsberg, you drug him into the conversation.
Now if you refer to Julian Assange (putting his thumb on the scale to hurt Hillary)
Bear in mind, that he was a hero to the left, until he released Hilary's emails.
And why did he release Hillary's emails? He did so because Hillary as Secretary of State, pursued his extradition so he could get tried in America.
And why did she pursue his extradition, because she is part of the cabal, or rather was currying favor with them.
The homegrown fascists had, during Dubya's administration, used the attack of 9/11 as an excuse to pull out of the drawer the PATRIOT act, which was already written during the Clinton Administration, and kept in the safe until something would justify it.
The PATRIOT is a fascist wet dream, they were jubilant, and if Obama and Hillary were really Democrats, they would have killed it, but worse yet, when Hillary became Secretary of State, She doubled down and did the fascists bidding.
Maybe you are a fan of Hilllary, but I am not, she is not a progressive, just a self aggrandizing , self serving, opportunist. The wife of the man who created swing states, the rust belt, and was owned by international financial institutions and the Chamber of Commerce. I don't trust her, because of her track record and her apparent insincerity
And why do they call themselves a Chamber. In politics a Chamber is a word for a legislative body. For instance. Italy's Chamber of Deputies. In this case the Chamber of
Commerce is not officially a part of Congress, but through their bribes, they are.
3. Use selective prosecution to punish those who speak out.
Well it isn't the Trump humpers who have monopolized this tactic.
Biden's DHS is still tracking progressives, and recently arrested protesters against Cop City being built in Atlanta, GA and they still expend resources on tracking progressive movements like antifa(scism)
On June 3, 2017, while employed by the military contractor Pluribus International Corporation, Reality Winner was arrested on suspicion of leaking an intelligence report about Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections from the National Security Agency (NSA) to the news website The Intercept. She was arrested and imprisoned by Trump, yet she is still in prison. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_Winner
Then there was this dude who leaded info about a National Security (GESTAPO) state, he was forced to find safety in Russia, but did America a huge favor by disclosing this top secret neo GESTAPO government.
Ironically the same situation with Julian Assange, when he leaked info about the National Security State and DHS, he was hailed as a hero by liberals, until he worked with Putin to release Hillary's emails.
Then he became anathema to liberals. And he did so why, because Hillary had been trying to extradite him to America when Secretary of State.
So we have a history of "liberals" chasing after and condoning the persecution of people who expose the national security state, in this way Democrats become enablers of their own enemies.
And we have the treacherous right winger Christopher Wray running the FBI, and Trump humpers running or embedded in vital cabinets from DHS, to NSA, DOD and Customs and Border Patrol.
Trump gave Biden a tool which he could use to purge these departments of these tools, but revoked EO 13957, which created Schedule F civil servants from political appointees, with the first EO he signed EO 14002
So do I understand that we are to do nothing about fascism because some more aggressive "Liberals" are being watched for their illegal activities??
You cant start or win a revolution until even the Democratic haters fall into place with one camp, either the Magats or the Progressives as blue Dems.
Make a choice or step out of the way. Your obvious support for anyone other than "Blue" pols will get you your friends a fascist dictatorship sooner than later.
I would welcome your ideas for change as a blue supporter but not as a destructive critic. Just make a choice please.
Where in creation did you come up with that conclusion. You need to go back and take remedial in reading comprehension.
Actually you vindicate my concern, I am very, very progressive, but out worst enemies are within the blue house. The centrists, the conservadems, the compromisers, they always cede to the fascists, because they want everyone to like them., hence bipartisanship. We need the same power within the Democratic party as the fascists have in the Republican party, but we aren't going to get there with a center right core, which iis what we have. They might as well be Republicans.
I have trouble with putting Assange and Snowden in the same category as Daniel Ellsberg. For one thing, Daniel Ellsberg was willing to go to trial. He didn’t hide in an embassy or run to Russia. Someone who runs to Russia, the country which poisons dissidents and currently has a WSJ reporter in jail-isn’t a champion for free speech. Also, there is a difference between exposing wrong doing and putting one’s thumb on the scale to hurt a political candidate
I never even mentioned Ellsberg, you drug him into the conversation.
Now if you refer to Julian Assange (putting his thumb on the scale to hurt Hillary)
Bear in mind, that he was a hero to the left, until he released Hilary's emails.
And why did he release Hillary's emails? He did so because Hillary as Secretary of State, pursued his extradition so he could get tried in America.
And why did she pursue his extradition, because she is part of the cabal, or rather was currying favor with them.
The homegrown fascists had, during Dubya's administration, used the attack of 9/11 as an excuse to pull out of the drawer the PATRIOT act, which was already written during the Clinton Administration, and kept in the safe until something would justify it.
The PATRIOT is a fascist wet dream, they were jubilant, and if Obama and Hillary were really Democrats, they would have killed it, but worse yet, when Hillary became Secretary of State, She doubled down and did the fascists bidding.
Maybe you are a fan of Hilllary, but I am not, she is not a progressive, just a self aggrandizing , self serving, opportunist. The wife of the man who created swing states, the rust belt, and was owned by international financial institutions and the Chamber of Commerce. I don't trust her, because of her track record and her apparent insincerity
And why do they call themselves a Chamber. In politics a Chamber is a word for a legislative body. For instance. Italy's Chamber of Deputies. In this case the Chamber of
Commerce is not officially a part of Congress, but through their bribes, they are.