Meidastouch has been holding out to the public that it has overtaken Fox et al in social media. I have given them some unsolicited advice. Every time they are defamed on Fox et al they should get a lawyer and sue. Dominion vs Fox exposed the underbelly. What has happened to the Fox shareholder derivitive suit in Delaware?
Likewise why hasn't DNC sued Fox over their publishing lies? The DNC PAID big money to advertise on Fox di=uring the 2000 cycle. At a mininmum Fox should not have spread lies.
Comcast is spinning off a number of its cable networks into a new, independent company called "SpinCo":
Networks: USA Network, MSNBC, CNBC, SYFY, E!, Oxygen, and the Golf Channel
Digital assets: Fandango, Rotten Tomatoes, GolfNow, and SportsEngine
The spin-off is expected to take place in August 2024 and will be tax-free for existing shareholders. Comcast's remaining company, "RemainCo", will focus on other areas of the business, including streaming, broadband, wireless, and theme parks.
Comcast's decision to spin off its cable networks is a reflection of the changing media landscape, where streaming platforms are becoming increasingly dominant. The new company will be able to operate more independently and focus on its own priorities. It may also be able to attract new partners and investors.
Some say that the spin-off could lead to more options for customers, who may be able to curate subscriptions based on their interests. Others are concerned that the changes could make it more difficult for consumers to find what they're looking for, and that paying for multiple services could become a burden.
Comcast Plans To Spin Off Its Cable Networks And Digital ...
Nov 26, 2024 — Comcast Corp (NASDAQ: CMCSA, $43.20; Market Capitalization: $165.3 billion), a massive conglomerate that provides broa...
Conventional cable is history. Investing in it iseems like investing in 8-track players. Smart TV and access of television through the internet is replacing ridiculous highly ComCast cable charges for the privilege of watching snippets of programs between unlimited ads, many pushing "ask your doctor" for drugs that supposedly cure conditions viewers never knew existed.
Only the USA and New Zealand permit pushing pharma ads on public TV. Thank our bribed politicians for continuing to allow that.
I dumped cable TV a decade ago before it was fashionable to actually subscribe to award-winning investigative journalists instead. Haven't watched Fox since.
After you see the data and research "critical thinking" and "evidence-based reasoning." You would do well to study both. Neither is labeling people you do not know or name-calling. Check the data before presuming to know what you do not the next time.
More whataboutism. You took well to being conditioned.
While you are trying to learn about evidence-based reasoning and critical thinking. Take up logic and the fallacy "appeal to authority." How many agencies say the same thing in an echo chamber isn't a substitute for evidence.
What we do know from actual study (like the one I posted from Nature) is that all the noise made by trolls of all sorts didn't significantly sway votes in the 2016 election. In 2016, with Democrats rigging their own primary, violating their own Bylaws, and lying to their own rank and file--then getting caught at it-- Wasserman Schultz and her DNC didn't need any help from Russians to throwi the nation to Trump. Even those of us who tried afterwards could not overcome that.
Distracting finger pointing like yours lets partisan stooges avoid doing any real governance, like fixing a murderous for-profit health care system, which would involve costing their corporate donors a dime.
The position that scientists and researchers are foreign agents or idiots can only be advocated from a bot or a hireling acting as a partisan stooge. The last quote from "Science" (not a Russian source) applies particularly to partisan stooges.
"Russian Twitter campaigns during the 2016 presidential race primarily reached a small subset of users, most of whom were highly partisan Republicans, shows a new study by NYU’s Center for Social Media and Politics. In addition, the international research team found that despite Russia’s influence operations on the platform, there were no measurable changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior among those exposed to this foreign influence campaign.
"We demonstrate, first, that exposure to Russian disinformation accounts was heavily concentrated: only 1% of users accounted for 70% of exposures. Second, exposure was concentrated among users who strongly identified as Republicans. Third, exposure to the Russian influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domestic news media and politicians. Finally, we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior.
"The Russian online disinformation effort during the 2016 US presidential election influenced neither attitudes nor voter behavior, new research shows. But the disinformation campaign may have had its largest effects by convincing Americans that its campaign was successful."
"The most worrisome misinformation in U.S. politics remains the old-fashioned kind: false and misleading statements made by elected officials who dominate news coverage and wield the powers of government."
"Partisanship is the most important determinant of vote choice and is an extremely stable trait. Strong partisans (roughly 40% of the population) are deeply committed to their political beliefs and preferences, which makes them extraordinarily nonresponsive to electoral persuasion from the other side but excellent candidates for mobilization."
Considering that the Dems and Pubs slop at the same trough, and the Dems sat back, and allowed the Republicans to build and dominate the base of America, and that Dems have proven to be loyal opposition (loyal to the money powers) I think it is time for a popular uprising.
Marianne Williamson is currently running for the DNC chair. Support her. She knows and gas what it takes. I don’t know how to put clips in these texts. Look up MW wants to be a megaphone
Very interesting .. are there any efforts underway to start addressing this, or are the democrats simply giving up the ship
Soros' son has been buying radio & TV stations. Republicans are agahst! https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-oversight-probes-fccs-expedited-approval-soros-purchase-200-radio-stations-ahead-election
Meidastouch has been holding out to the public that it has overtaken Fox et al in social media. I have given them some unsolicited advice. Every time they are defamed on Fox et al they should get a lawyer and sue. Dominion vs Fox exposed the underbelly. What has happened to the Fox shareholder derivitive suit in Delaware?
Likewise why hasn't DNC sued Fox over their publishing lies? The DNC PAID big money to advertise on Fox di=uring the 2000 cycle. At a mininmum Fox should not have spread lies.
Also what about a hostile takeover of the Comcast broadcasting properties? That would be a start. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hostiletakeover.asp
Comcast is spinning off a number of its cable networks into a new, independent company called "SpinCo":
Networks: USA Network, MSNBC, CNBC, SYFY, E!, Oxygen, and the Golf Channel
Digital assets: Fandango, Rotten Tomatoes, GolfNow, and SportsEngine
The spin-off is expected to take place in August 2024 and will be tax-free for existing shareholders. Comcast's remaining company, "RemainCo", will focus on other areas of the business, including streaming, broadband, wireless, and theme parks.
Comcast's decision to spin off its cable networks is a reflection of the changing media landscape, where streaming platforms are becoming increasingly dominant. The new company will be able to operate more independently and focus on its own priorities. It may also be able to attract new partners and investors.
Some say that the spin-off could lead to more options for customers, who may be able to curate subscriptions based on their interests. Others are concerned that the changes could make it more difficult for consumers to find what they're looking for, and that paying for multiple services could become a burden.
Comcast Plans To Spin Off Its Cable Networks And Digital ...
Nov 26, 2024 — Comcast Corp (NASDAQ: CMCSA, $43.20; Market Capitalization: $165.3 billion), a massive conglomerate that provides broa...
How about NBC?
Conventional cable is history. Investing in it iseems like investing in 8-track players. Smart TV and access of television through the internet is replacing ridiculous highly ComCast cable charges for the privilege of watching snippets of programs between unlimited ads, many pushing "ask your doctor" for drugs that supposedly cure conditions viewers never knew existed.
Only the USA and New Zealand permit pushing pharma ads on public TV. Thank our bribed politicians for continuing to allow that.
Says the guy who bought the Fox garbage.
I dumped cable TV a decade ago before it was fashionable to actually subscribe to award-winning investigative journalists instead. Haven't watched Fox since.
After you see the data and research "critical thinking" and "evidence-based reasoning." You would do well to study both. Neither is labeling people you do not know or name-calling. Check the data before presuming to know what you do not the next time.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/251268/number-of-pay-tv-households-in-the-us/
Just Saturday, you doubled down on a humongous lie -- that was killed when the perp, Durham, was exposed.
More whataboutism. You took well to being conditioned.
While you are trying to learn about evidence-based reasoning and critical thinking. Take up logic and the fallacy "appeal to authority." How many agencies say the same thing in an echo chamber isn't a substitute for evidence.
What we do know from actual study (like the one I posted from Nature) is that all the noise made by trolls of all sorts didn't significantly sway votes in the 2016 election. In 2016, with Democrats rigging their own primary, violating their own Bylaws, and lying to their own rank and file--then getting caught at it-- Wasserman Schultz and her DNC didn't need any help from Russians to throwi the nation to Trump. Even those of us who tried afterwards could not overcome that.
Distracting finger pointing like yours lets partisan stooges avoid doing any real governance, like fixing a murderous for-profit health care system, which would involve costing their corporate donors a dime.
If you're not a Russian agent you're a willing idiot.
The position that scientists and researchers are foreign agents or idiots can only be advocated from a bot or a hireling acting as a partisan stooge. The last quote from "Science" (not a Russian source) applies particularly to partisan stooges.
https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2023/january/exposure-to-russian-twitter-campaigns-in-2016-presidential-race-.html
"Russian Twitter campaigns during the 2016 presidential race primarily reached a small subset of users, most of whom were highly partisan Republicans, shows a new study by NYU’s Center for Social Media and Politics. In addition, the international research team found that despite Russia’s influence operations on the platform, there were no measurable changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior among those exposed to this foreign influence campaign.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35576-9
"We demonstrate, first, that exposure to Russian disinformation accounts was heavily concentrated: only 1% of users accounted for 70% of exposures. Second, exposure was concentrated among users who strongly identified as Republicans. Third, exposure to the Russian influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domestic news media and politicians. Finally, we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior.
https://socialsciences.ku.dk/news/2023/russias-disinformation-campaign-in-the-us-did-not-influence-political-attitudes-or-voting-behavior/
"The Russian online disinformation effort during the 2016 US presidential election influenced neither attitudes nor voter behavior, new research shows. But the disinformation campaign may have had its largest effects by convincing Americans that its campaign was successful."
https://gen.medium.com/why-fears-of-fake-news-are-overhyped-2ed9ca0a52c9
"The most worrisome misinformation in U.S. politics remains the old-fashioned kind: false and misleading statements made by elected officials who dominate news coverage and wield the powers of government."
https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.abb2437
"Partisanship is the most important determinant of vote choice and is an extremely stable trait. Strong partisans (roughly 40% of the population) are deeply committed to their political beliefs and preferences, which makes them extraordinarily nonresponsive to electoral persuasion from the other side but excellent candidates for mobilization."
Considering that the Dems and Pubs slop at the same trough, and the Dems sat back, and allowed the Republicans to build and dominate the base of America, and that Dems have proven to be loyal opposition (loyal to the money powers) I think it is time for a popular uprising.
Marianne Williamson is currently running for the DNC chair. Support her. She knows and gas what it takes. I don’t know how to put clips in these texts. Look up MW wants to be a megaphone
MW, Ruthy, is all love and light, and that won't win the day, because it hasn't, ever in the history of the world.
Beam her up!