The Real Crime General Milley Exposed Laid Bare
If the GOP had the courage of the Senate Republicans in 1974, Milley never would have been in a position to worry that an American president might start a nuclear war just to hang on to power
Joint Chiefs Chairman General Mark Milley stepped outside the realm of his constitutional power to prevent Donald Trump from starting nuclear war with China or Iran. It was definitely unconstitutional and probably illegal. But he’s not the true villain in this story; the true villain is almost never mentioned in the press.
Trump’s advisors aren’t the villains, either, although Trump was just the latest Republican president advised by Paul Manafort and Roger Stone, whose partner in the years after they advised Nixon, Lee Atwater, had passed away from brain cancer after making a public apology for all the damage he did to our nation in the service of Nixon’s party and, later, George HW Bush (Willie Horton, et al).
And Nixon, too, presented such a threat to world peace and democracy in America that his own Defense Secretary, James Schlesinger, took actions remarkably similar to Milley’s, as was revealed by the Washington Post on August 22, 1974. Schlesinger and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs George S. Brown (who’d just taken that post on July 1, 1974), the Post wrote, “kept a close watch to make certain that no orders were given to military units outside the normal chain of command.”
Specifically, Schlesinger and Brown were worried that Nixon would start a nuclear war to stay in power as he became increasingly under siege in the Watergate scandal. Congress relieved them of that burden when Barry Goldwater walked over to the White House and informed Nixon that both Democrats and Republicans in the Senate were going to vote to impeach and remove him from office if he didn’t resign immediately.
Which highlights the true villains in the General Mark Milley story who are almost always overlooked in the press: 50 Republicans in the US Senate, led by Mitch McConnell, who twice refused to remove Trump from office after the House had impeached him.
It’s not like these senators didn’t know that Trump was an unstable narcissist who had both loyalties and financial ties to autocrats in Russia, Turkey and multiple other foreign countries. They not only knew but were informed in great detail during the first opportunity they were given to remove Trump from office in December of 2019.
The impeachment managers laid out in excruciating detail the evidence that Trump had repeated for the 2020 election what he and his children had tried to do with Russia in 2016: solicit foreign interference in a US election, this time by trying to bribe the president of Ukraine with the promise of American weapons. At any other time in American history that would have been prosecuted as outright treason.
For example, in the election of 1800, then-Vice President Thomas Jefferson benefitted from what we’d today call a tabloid journalist, James Callender, publishing stories about the XYZ Affair that explicitly suggested his opponent, then-President John Adams, had provoked the cold naval war with France that came out of the scandal just to help his reelection chances. The charges of treason hurt Adams badly in that election, helping hand it to Jefferson.
While Adams almost certainly hadn’t committed treason to stay in office, Trump almost certainly did, or something close to it. But the Republicans in the Senate were apparently unconcerned.
They knew by then that Trump and his family had both openly and secretly solicited and received Russian help in the 2016 election, that he’d trashed American intelligence agencies while elevating Russia’s in a public meeting with President Putin in Helsinki way back in July of 2018, and that he’d tried to strong-arm the president of Ukraine to manufacture dirt on Joe Biden.
Compared to Richard Nixon paying to bug the DNC headquarters in the Watergate complex and then lie about it afterwards, Trump’s behaviors were monstrous. But Republicans gave him a pass on his criminal behavior. Twice.
If even a bit over a dozen of them had had the courage of the senate Republicans in 1974, Milley never would have been in a position to worry that an American president might start a nuclear war just to hang onto power and thus avoid prosecution.
But Senate Republicans are proudly lacking in courage, patriotism or any sense of loyalty to our nation or its ideals; their only loyalties are to their own power and the billions their donors use to seduce and control them.
Milley (and then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper) shouldn’t have had to take actions that may well have saved the republic if Trump had played out what he was considering.
And the American media needs to put the blame for that squarely where it belongs: fifty Republicans in the US Senate who chose their own self-interest over our country when Trump’s impeached fate was in their hands.
Trump's record of catastrophic ignorance, mental & emotional imbalance as POTUS required intervention from the beginning. Without knowing the history, military capacity, or the countries bordering North Korea or within an easy missile lob, Trump recklessly engaged in actions that raised the risks of an accidental nuclear war:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/north-korea-crisis-how-events-have-unfolded-under-trump-n753996
In the end, and after guidance from leaders of other countries, including Russia & his military leaders, Trump settled for two photoshoots, some love letters, and zero diplomatic progress in addressing North Korea's nuclear threat. Rather than pursuing the one potential route through diplomacy with China to help negotiate a nuclear agreement with North Korea, Trump chose to declare a trade war with China, which soon escalated into a new cold war. In the meantime, North Korea went about perfecting its weapons arsenal, which Trump claimed was within their understanding of an unwritten and stealth agreement. Trump viewed North Korea's short-range ballistic missiles as unthreatening, even though we had troops stationed in Japan, South Korea, and Guam.
After striking out on the Korean Peninsula and raising tensions with China while losing his trade war, Trump figured Iran would be his next target of sponsored interest, starting with disassembling the Iran Nuclear Treaty. How could he lose? The U.S. spends almost a trillion annually on its military while Iran spends about 15 billion:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-54972269
Again, Trump had not bothered to look at a map to determine the countries with significant oil production within the range of Iran's offensive missiles. It took an Iranian attack on Saudi Arabia's oil production to temper Trump for the moment, in addition to learning about the Straight of Hormuz. Russia was probably also instrumental in helping Trump understand specific options were off the table.
Seven months before the assassination of Qassem Soleimani, Trump was ready to improve his stature by assassinating Soleimani. However, in December of 2019, the House impeached Trump for putting his personal, political interests above the interests of U.S. foreign policy. Rather than learning a lesson from his new title of an impeached POTUS and its consequent disgrace, Trump became more determined to elevate his low standing and get reelected. However, he needed a justification to offset the risks of starting a major Regional War. Qassem Soleimani had been on Trump's radar for seven months. In his mind, a war would satisfy his sponsors, make him a wartime POTUS, and elevate his status in the Presidential Elections. Towards the end of 2019, before the pandemic, the American economy was slowing. Most economists predicted a recession, and of the massive new debt his Admin had created, 83% went to the wealthiest Americans and their concentrated ownership of corporate wealth.
When the military presented Trump with options to respond to probable Iranian involvement in an attack in Iraq, Trump chose the option that would benefit him the most and likely result in a counter-attack on undefended American troops in Iraq:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iraq-security-usa-iran/trump-authorizes-military-to-respond-after-deadly-attack-blamed-on-iran-backed-militia-idUSKBN20Z251
Fortunately, Iran was only interested in responding with a minimal but clear message. They don't want a war with the U.S. and don't try to start a fight when your troops are unprotected, as Trump couldn't wait to do.
To America, the message of the Trump Crises should be don't elect unqualified representatives who put their interests and pathologies above the country's, the general welfare, a sustainable future, the truth, and our democracy. Learn to spot a desperate & corrupt con man or woman. Demand that our democratic institutions provide the necessary, Constitutional checks and balances on each other.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2020/01/14/why-did-the-pentagon-ever-give-trump-the-option-of-killing-soleimani/
One should not have to commit treason to prevent treason...
Such is life as we pass through the delicate membrane seperating reality from the absurd.
Perhaps in our last hours of knowability we will learn just how close a near miss may have occurred in Donald's final days as Demander and Thief.
Perhaps we will reform our lawful documents such that they are of a living nature, inclusive of nuance - rather than the static, technicality-ridden obstacle to the very "order" they fail to fulfill.