I have a different view on your comment. I interpret what you wrote as somewhat like comparing oranges and apples. What I mean is that I see choosing who represents the USofA as a nation at the federal level seeming to me to be^ very different than states having the right to decide how they want to organize and govern themselves as citiz…
I have a different view on your comment. I interpret what you wrote as somewhat like comparing oranges and apples. What I mean is that I see choosing who represents the USofA as a nation at the federal level seeming to me to be^ very different than states having the right to decide how they want to organize and govern themselves as citizens residing in any particular state (how they want to nurture each other's wellbeing as state residents; their culture (the extent they want to allow their residents to kill each other (gun control); the extent they want to allow their male residents to control their female residents such as female bodies (abortion issues); the extent to which they want to allow, their residents to be fully informed and educated with the most honest information (censorship issues); the extent to which they want to share risks to health (universal health care), etc. In my opinion, the later are for the most part state issues, except where they violate the US Constitution as agreed by citizens of all the states as US citizens.
I have a different view on your comment. I interpret what you wrote as somewhat like comparing oranges and apples. What I mean is that I see choosing who represents the USofA as a nation at the federal level seeming to me to be^ very different than states having the right to decide how they want to organize and govern themselves as citizens residing in any particular state (how they want to nurture each other's wellbeing as state residents; their culture (the extent they want to allow their residents to kill each other (gun control); the extent they want to allow their male residents to control their female residents such as female bodies (abortion issues); the extent to which they want to allow, their residents to be fully informed and educated with the most honest information (censorship issues); the extent to which they want to share risks to health (universal health care), etc. In my opinion, the later are for the most part state issues, except where they violate the US Constitution as agreed by citizens of all the states as US citizens.