Kay, the whole "pro life" thing is not and never was about life. It is about one thing and one thing only, male control of females. Patriarchalism, which results in misogyny.
Kay, the whole "pro life" thing is not and never was about life. It is about one thing and one thing only, male control of females. Patriarchalism, which results in misogyny.
Absolutely - if they cared about “life”, these hateful people would care about impoverished pregnant women. They would ensure that these pregnant women and girls had the health care, food, housing and education they require. These “pro-lifers”, would be ensuring that the children they are insisting women and girls bring into the world have a family (somewhere) to love and raise them. That these unwanted children are fed, educated and given the healthcare they also require. Just as their Christian Lord Jesus instructed - but NO - as you correctly point out - it’s about control - not love - and women know it. So - let there be freedom or let there be blood
Absolutely Kay. I have been calling out pro lifers as the fraud they are, since the internet was DOS only, and messages were read posted via FTP.
Pro life is pro lie. The subject is not unborn babies, anymore than Mom's for liberty is about liberty. It is about maintaining a system of male dominance, aka patriarchy, and the worst part, the most virulent supporters are Karen's, women. And i understand why that is. !. They are easily manipulated by hormones (talk of killing unborn babies) and they believe that the established order of male domination best suits them and their needs, by providing them with protection and security.
Yes Kay, I remember Phyllis Schafly,. and have brought her up many times as an example of a woman who betrayed her own gender, because she was made rich, famous and empowered by the patriarchy.
She, single handedly, launched the campaign, that stopped the Equal Rights Amendment from getting ratified,, Probably doesn't matter, the Supreme court of the Republic of Gilead, led by the Handmaid in chief, would have voided it, just like they voided the Voting Rights act, led by the House slave in chief, Clarence Thomas.
I saw Schafly at Reagan’s convention before he was first elected. She looked arrogant and cold, covered in Anti-ERA crap. I was so-disgusted. I must have been glaring at her when I had to walk past her because she was definitely “aware” of me. Cate Blanchett did a great job playing her in Mrs.America. I never even considered that the SCROTUS (saw that on another post) could void the ERA if it was an Amendment. That’s why I always voted pro-choice because Roe was so dicey. The damage to voting rights is frightening.
Kay, the whole "pro life" thing is not and never was about life. It is about one thing and one thing only, male control of females. Patriarchalism, which results in misogyny.
Absolutely - if they cared about “life”, these hateful people would care about impoverished pregnant women. They would ensure that these pregnant women and girls had the health care, food, housing and education they require. These “pro-lifers”, would be ensuring that the children they are insisting women and girls bring into the world have a family (somewhere) to love and raise them. That these unwanted children are fed, educated and given the healthcare they also require. Just as their Christian Lord Jesus instructed - but NO - as you correctly point out - it’s about control - not love - and women know it. So - let there be freedom or let there be blood
Absolutely Kay. I have been calling out pro lifers as the fraud they are, since the internet was DOS only, and messages were read posted via FTP.
Pro life is pro lie. The subject is not unborn babies, anymore than Mom's for liberty is about liberty. It is about maintaining a system of male dominance, aka patriarchy, and the worst part, the most virulent supporters are Karen's, women. And i understand why that is. !. They are easily manipulated by hormones (talk of killing unborn babies) and they believe that the established order of male domination best suits them and their needs, by providing them with protection and security.
Remember Phyllis Schafly
Yes Kay, I remember Phyllis Schafly,. and have brought her up many times as an example of a woman who betrayed her own gender, because she was made rich, famous and empowered by the patriarchy.
She, single handedly, launched the campaign, that stopped the Equal Rights Amendment from getting ratified,, Probably doesn't matter, the Supreme court of the Republic of Gilead, led by the Handmaid in chief, would have voided it, just like they voided the Voting Rights act, led by the House slave in chief, Clarence Thomas.
I saw Schafly at Reagan’s convention before he was first elected. She looked arrogant and cold, covered in Anti-ERA crap. I was so-disgusted. I must have been glaring at her when I had to walk past her because she was definitely “aware” of me. Cate Blanchett did a great job playing her in Mrs.America. I never even considered that the SCROTUS (saw that on another post) could void the ERA if it was an Amendment. That’s why I always voted pro-choice because Roe was so dicey. The damage to voting rights is frightening.
No SCROTUM couldn't void the ERA, but they can put their own spin on it, as they have the 1st and 2nd and other amendments.