Obviously, a person with multiple personalities. But that was then, this is now. We must face present facts, and the truths they tenaciously validate. That is the difficult part, due to emotional intelligence being at, perhaps, an all time low. There is a TV station near me that has the anchor stating, in an ad for the station, that they…
Obviously, a person with multiple personalities. But that was then, this is now. We must face present facts, and the truths they tenaciously validate. That is the difficult part, due to emotional intelligence being at, perhaps, an all time low. There is a TV station near me that has the anchor stating, in an ad for the station, that they only dig for the best facts they can validate, but they are not in the business of 'truth.' They leave that up to the listeners. This is classic, laissez faire dualism. Hear or see facts, and then do what you want with them. Is this how critical thinking is now taught? Cranial and endocrine-based emotions cannot be mixed in with vetted factual information. As you point out, that king, when a prince, wrote publicly against slavery. How did he decide that was the correct conclusion? Facts must substantiate truths, or they are not really facts.
Obviously, a person with multiple personalities. But that was then, this is now. We must face present facts, and the truths they tenaciously validate. That is the difficult part, due to emotional intelligence being at, perhaps, an all time low. There is a TV station near me that has the anchor stating, in an ad for the station, that they only dig for the best facts they can validate, but they are not in the business of 'truth.' They leave that up to the listeners. This is classic, laissez faire dualism. Hear or see facts, and then do what you want with them. Is this how critical thinking is now taught? Cranial and endocrine-based emotions cannot be mixed in with vetted factual information. As you point out, that king, when a prince, wrote publicly against slavery. How did he decide that was the correct conclusion? Facts must substantiate truths, or they are not really facts.
Mick see my response to Chris. Even Henry VIII and Elizabeth were manipulated by the House of Lords and the nobility.
Where yanking their broadcast license is censorship & insisting on “facts” in the news infringes their free speech. Thru the looking glass we go.