No P.J. as you know I have the same question as you, There are no books that will answer the question as you know. And I don't judge a book by it's cover, only it's contents and the book of Obama is pretty much devoid of contents.
The much lauded 600 page ACA was not the life saver it is held out to be, it was in fact a gift to AHIP (Asso…
No P.J. as you know I have the same question as you, There are no books that will answer the question as you know. And I don't judge a book by it's cover, only it's contents and the book of Obama is pretty much devoid of contents.
The much lauded 600 page ACA was not the life saver it is held out to be, it was in fact a gift to AHIP (Association of Health Insurance Providers) , we could have had medicare for all which would have requirednothing more than a few word change to 42 U.S. Code §§ 1395c–1395i-5 , to wit: change eligible at age 65 to eligible at birth.
But the Democratic party is dependent on donor cash, so Rahm Emanuel and Nancy Pelosi stood in the way.
Obama a nice guy, but D.C. politics a blank slate and he was jumped on and taken advantage of by the beltway insiders, the corporate obliged.
No P.J. as you know I have the same question as you, There are no books that will answer the question as you know. And I don't judge a book by it's cover, only it's contents and the book of Obama is pretty much devoid of contents.
The much lauded 600 page ACA was not the life saver it is held out to be, it was in fact a gift to AHIP (Association of Health Insurance Providers) , we could have had medicare for all which would have requirednothing more than a few word change to 42 U.S. Code §§ 1395c–1395i-5 , to wit: change eligible at age 65 to eligible at birth.
But the Democratic party is dependent on donor cash, so Rahm Emanuel and Nancy Pelosi stood in the way.
Obama a nice guy, but D.C. politics a blank slate and he was jumped on and taken advantage of by the beltway insiders, the corporate obliged.