Thom, with all due respect, anyone who stumps for escalation of war stoking nationalism and shutting down any opposing views is not a progressive. Anyone who says Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are "identical presidential candidates" is not a progressive. Anyone who calls Nancy Pelosi a progressive is certainly not a progressive. Any…
Thom, with all due respect, anyone who stumps for escalation of war stoking nationalism and shutting down any opposing views is not a progressive. Anyone who says Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are "identical presidential candidates" is not a progressive. Anyone who calls Nancy Pelosi a progressive is certainly not a progressive. Anyone who takes a call from a white woman who is beside herself because she believes that the reason liberals are so obsessed with Putin's invasion of Ukraine and by the same token completely unconcerned with Democrats' complicity in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen and Israel (to name a few) is because those in the latter countries are uneducated and poor unlike "us" and that is met with only a chuckle and an aside that "there is racism" is not a progressive. Anyone who takes a call about Putin's invasion of Ukraine and completely disregards NATO's history, accusing that caller of spreading Putin's propaganda, is definitely not a progressive. You work almost solely for the electoral prospects of Democrats, thinking that stifling critical thinking regarding their inhumanity and donor-diluted public policy (see: Affordable Care Act) will somehow win elections and improve things for marginalized populations and the working class. How has that strategy been working over the past eight years or so?
Thom, with all due respect, anyone who stumps for escalation of war stoking nationalism and shutting down any opposing views is not a progressive. Anyone who says Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are "identical presidential candidates" is not a progressive. Anyone who calls Nancy Pelosi a progressive is certainly not a progressive. Anyone who takes a call from a white woman who is beside herself because she believes that the reason liberals are so obsessed with Putin's invasion of Ukraine and by the same token completely unconcerned with Democrats' complicity in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen and Israel (to name a few) is because those in the latter countries are uneducated and poor unlike "us" and that is met with only a chuckle and an aside that "there is racism" is not a progressive. Anyone who takes a call about Putin's invasion of Ukraine and completely disregards NATO's history, accusing that caller of spreading Putin's propaganda, is definitely not a progressive. You work almost solely for the electoral prospects of Democrats, thinking that stifling critical thinking regarding their inhumanity and donor-diluted public policy (see: Affordable Care Act) will somehow win elections and improve things for marginalized populations and the working class. How has that strategy been working over the past eight years or so?