I really hope the six bought and paid for read the friends of the court briefs submitted by the 25 historians, the 6 historians (this group includes Dr. Timothy Snyder and Dr. Ruth Ben-Ghiat both of whom have SubStack newsletters), BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE J. MICHAEL LUTTIG, and BRIEF OF CAPITOL POLICE OFFICERS PRESENT AT THE U.S. CAPITOL O…
I really hope the six bought and paid for read the friends of the court briefs submitted by the 25 historians, the 6 historians (this group includes Dr. Timothy Snyder and Dr. Ruth Ben-Ghiat both of whom have SubStack newsletters), BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE J. MICHAEL LUTTIG, and BRIEF OF CAPITOL POLICE OFFICERS PRESENT AT THE U.S. CAPITOL ON JANUARY 6, 2021, AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS.
They are all ironclad for disqualification. Trashes the falsehood that Congress determines if tRump is qualified under Section 3. Trashes the falsehood that Section 3 is not self enforcing. Trashes the falsehood that tRump had 1st Amendment protection. Trashes the falsehood that it wasn’t insurrection.
Any decision or opinion from any of the six in favor of tRump, no matter how they write it, will be a blatant misinterpretation of the Constitution and far worse and much more obviously political than Bush v. Gore.
I really hope the six bought and paid for read the friends of the court briefs submitted by the 25 historians, the 6 historians (this group includes Dr. Timothy Snyder and Dr. Ruth Ben-Ghiat both of whom have SubStack newsletters), BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE J. MICHAEL LUTTIG, and BRIEF OF CAPITOL POLICE OFFICERS PRESENT AT THE U.S. CAPITOL ON JANUARY 6, 2021, AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS.
They are all ironclad for disqualification. Trashes the falsehood that Congress determines if tRump is qualified under Section 3. Trashes the falsehood that Section 3 is not self enforcing. Trashes the falsehood that tRump had 1st Amendment protection. Trashes the falsehood that it wasn’t insurrection.
Any decision or opinion from any of the six in favor of tRump, no matter how they write it, will be a blatant misinterpretation of the Constitution and far worse and much more obviously political than Bush v. Gore.
Correct.