If oral "arguments" are any indication, this will be far, far worse than Bush v Gore. The 3 Democratic nominees seemed unwilling to drag their feet, let alone jam on the brakes. I fear a unanimous, "It's OK for trump to run / hold office," and without the veil of a, "Don't you dare ever use this as precedent," disclaimer. Little hope for a scathing dissent like Stevens'.
If oral "arguments" are any indication, this will be far, far worse than Bush v Gore. The 3 Democratic nominees seemed unwilling to drag their feet, let alone jam on the brakes. I fear a unanimous, "It's OK for trump to run / hold office," and without the veil of a, "Don't you dare ever use this as precedent," disclaimer. Little hope for a scathing dissent like Stevens'.
If oral "arguments" are any indication, this will be far, far worse than Bush v Gore. The 3 Democratic nominees seemed unwilling to drag their feet, let alone jam on the brakes. I fear a unanimous, "It's OK for trump to run / hold office," and without the veil of a, "Don't you dare ever use this as precedent," disclaimer. Little hope for a scathing dissent like Stevens'.