In aftermath of arguments coverage, I note that 6-day evidentiary hearing and fact-finding of lower court seems to have been blown-off, which to me flies in the face of what "appellate" is supposed to mean. It's not, fundamentally, supposed to be about re-interpreting, or speculating, or dissing-off, the fact-finding based on due process…
In aftermath of arguments coverage, I note that 6-day evidentiary hearing and fact-finding of lower court seems to have been blown-off, which to me flies in the face of what "appellate" is supposed to mean. It's not, fundamentally, supposed to be about re-interpreting, or speculating, or dissing-off, the fact-finding based on due process (which there was in Colorado). So the great champions of "States Rights" are absolutely selecting the rights of States to oppress fertile females, but not so much to manage Constitutional elections.
In aftermath of arguments coverage, I note that 6-day evidentiary hearing and fact-finding of lower court seems to have been blown-off, which to me flies in the face of what "appellate" is supposed to mean. It's not, fundamentally, supposed to be about re-interpreting, or speculating, or dissing-off, the fact-finding based on due process (which there was in Colorado). So the great champions of "States Rights" are absolutely selecting the rights of States to oppress fertile females, but not so much to manage Constitutional elections.