Ah thx now I'm starting to realize that there is some kind of talking point repeated that the DOJ picked Judge cannon because they picked Florida as the venue. This is hilariously stupid to a first year law student, let alone a former federal investigator. Again seems like some arrogant lefties think they know more than they do, and repe…
Ah thx now I'm starting to realize that there is some kind of talking point repeated that the DOJ picked Judge cannon because they picked Florida as the venue. This is hilariously stupid to a first year law student, let alone a former federal investigator. Again seems like some arrogant lefties think they know more than they do, and repeating right wing talking points designed to undermine the DOJ.
Marc I asked you a question: Clarify please who your are, not your curriculum vitae. I asked you that on Jul 19, and you come back at me in a subsequent article, with a string of ad hominems impugning my intelligence, education and knowledge. Not an answer. Now that I am on to you, I will continue to respond to your comments by asking the same question over and over.
Your failure to answer forces me to assume bad faith, and I would like to assume good faith.
By the way I am immune to personal opinions, cause I really don't give a sh**. my opinion of self is all that matters. I have to be true to myself.
I've laid myself bare, who I am, what my opinions are, my world view, who I favor, who disappoints and why, and who I consider the enemy not only of Democracy, but the world, and why I hold those opinions. You not,just a bunch of allegations and false facts, like a "powerful progressive media"
So tell us who you really are, or I will be forced to assume that you are a Russian troll or a Trump humper
Ah thx now I'm starting to realize that there is some kind of talking point repeated that the DOJ picked Judge cannon because they picked Florida as the venue. This is hilariously stupid to a first year law student, let alone a former federal investigator. Again seems like some arrogant lefties think they know more than they do, and repeating right wing talking points designed to undermine the DOJ.
Marc I asked you a question: Clarify please who your are, not your curriculum vitae. I asked you that on Jul 19, and you come back at me in a subsequent article, with a string of ad hominems impugning my intelligence, education and knowledge. Not an answer. Now that I am on to you, I will continue to respond to your comments by asking the same question over and over.
Your failure to answer forces me to assume bad faith, and I would like to assume good faith.
By the way I am immune to personal opinions, cause I really don't give a sh**. my opinion of self is all that matters. I have to be true to myself.
I've laid myself bare, who I am, what my opinions are, my world view, who I favor, who disappoints and why, and who I consider the enemy not only of Democracy, but the world, and why I hold those opinions. You not,just a bunch of allegations and false facts, like a "powerful progressive media"
So tell us who you really are, or I will be forced to assume that you are a Russian troll or a Trump humper