I think the fast food analogy isn't quite right. I would compare it more to two groups that want to maintain their exclusive privilege at the expense of the workers. The workers get a very small say in anything. They may get to vote for new privileged leaders, but don't share in the profits or management. The one group may say consoling …
I think the fast food analogy isn't quite right. I would compare it more to two groups that want to maintain their exclusive privilege at the expense of the workers. The workers get a very small say in anything. They may get to vote for new privileged leaders, but don't share in the profits or management. The one group may say consoling things, but are kept from attaining their promises by a more malignant group of competitors. The fact that the two groups maintain a 50/50 hold on overall operations prevents a lot of what might be good for the workers from being achieved.
I think the fast food analogy isn't quite right. I would compare it more to two groups that want to maintain their exclusive privilege at the expense of the workers. The workers get a very small say in anything. They may get to vote for new privileged leaders, but don't share in the profits or management. The one group may say consoling things, but are kept from attaining their promises by a more malignant group of competitors. The fact that the two groups maintain a 50/50 hold on overall operations prevents a lot of what might be good for the workers from being achieved.