When a plaintiff/complainant wins a discrimination case, a legal remedy is supposed to make them "whole." Like I proably said elsewhyere, people still keep their Consitutional rights, and an unconstitutioal exexutive order doesn't immunize the perpetrator.
I think that where a pattern of discrimination is established, remedies like affirmative action will remain available.
When a plaintiff/complainant wins a discrimination case, a legal remedy is supposed to make them "whole." Like I proably said elsewhyere, people still keep their Consitutional rights, and an unconstitutioal exexutive order doesn't immunize the perpetrator.
I think that where a pattern of discrimination is established, remedies like affirmative action will remain available.
It might boomerang.
When a plaintiff/complainant wins a discrimination case, a legal remedy is supposed to make them "whole." Like I proably said elsewhyere, people still keep their Consitutional rights, and an unconstitutioal exexutive order doesn't immunize the perpetrator.
I think that where a pattern of discrimination is established, remedies like affirmative action will remain available.