You haven't corrected a thing. Part of my complaint has been that Garland and his Trump Humping DOJ,only prosecuted low level fools, that smashed down doors and broke windows, and even then only recommended what is essentially a slap on the wrist, misdeamenors, yes a handful of the worst actors got charged with felonies and series jail t…
You haven't corrected a thing. Part of my complaint has been that Garland and his Trump Humping DOJ,only prosecuted low level fools, that smashed down doors and broke windows, and even then only recommended what is essentially a slap on the wrist, misdeamenors, yes a handful of the worst actors got charged with felonies and series jail time.
That doesn't count because he hasn't even investigated much less indicted the leaders of the inssurection in Congress.
And as regards his investigation, he did wait until J6 did it's job, and had, while J6 committee was doing it's job, asked the committee to hand over it's records, (I suspect) to hide them.
You are hell bent on defending Garland, why is that, he hasn't even begun to investigate Jared and Ivanka, while appointing a special counsel to prosecute Hunter.
The Kushners are more guilty than Hunter, much more, receiving a 2 billion dollar gift from MBS, and using Trumps name to get copyrights and patents in China.
I took your advice and read the Jack Smith indictment of Trump, all 54 pages, I see nothing in it, that exculpates your constant harrasment.
So I ask you again, and will keep asking until you answer, what is in the indictment that is so important that you insist on trying to shame me and others,
If you're not interested in the conspiracy to steal the election, and associated false statements, perjury and criminal conduct by the highest-level members of the White House, then I agree - there is no need to read the indictment.
You also wouldn't be interested in news from legitimate sources about how the doj opened hundreds of cases while the doj supposedly dithered.
I have read, am interested by that is beside the point, I won't let you turn the question, by turning it back on me.
You said in a previous post, that all people want to do is to get their info from the TV, and haven't read the indictment. I have read the indictment, so what is so significant. TV news readers and host, simply do a Readers Digest of the Indicment.
Yep there are some conservatives who have better things to do than fellate Trump, the Federalist Society is anti Democratic, as well as carrying the raciest, homophobic, misogynistic and participial.
You haven't corrected a thing. Part of my complaint has been that Garland and his Trump Humping DOJ,only prosecuted low level fools, that smashed down doors and broke windows, and even then only recommended what is essentially a slap on the wrist, misdeamenors, yes a handful of the worst actors got charged with felonies and series jail time.
That doesn't count because he hasn't even investigated much less indicted the leaders of the inssurection in Congress.
And as regards his investigation, he did wait until J6 did it's job, and had, while J6 committee was doing it's job, asked the committee to hand over it's records, (I suspect) to hide them.
You are hell bent on defending Garland, why is that, he hasn't even begun to investigate Jared and Ivanka, while appointing a special counsel to prosecute Hunter.
The Kushners are more guilty than Hunter, much more, receiving a 2 billion dollar gift from MBS, and using Trumps name to get copyrights and patents in China.
I took your advice and read the Jack Smith indictment of Trump, all 54 pages, I see nothing in it, that exculpates your constant harrasment.
So I ask you again, and will keep asking until you answer, what is in the indictment that is so important that you insist on trying to shame me and others,
If you're not interested in the conspiracy to steal the election, and associated false statements, perjury and criminal conduct by the highest-level members of the White House, then I agree - there is no need to read the indictment.
You also wouldn't be interested in news from legitimate sources about how the doj opened hundreds of cases while the doj supposedly dithered.
Pathetic, really.
https://www.npr.org/2021/01/12/956145727/doj-opens-nearly-200-cases-into-pro-trump-riot-on-capitol-hill
I have read, am interested by that is beside the point, I won't let you turn the question, by turning it back on me.
You said in a previous post, that all people want to do is to get their info from the TV, and haven't read the indictment. I have read the indictment, so what is so significant. TV news readers and host, simply do a Readers Digest of the Indicment.
A couple of top scholars, federalist society members -writing that trump can be barred from running under the 14th amendment.
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-08-16/donald-trump-constitution-federalist-society-14th-amendment-insurrection
Yep there are some conservatives who have better things to do than fellate Trump, the Federalist Society is anti Democratic, as well as carrying the raciest, homophobic, misogynistic and participial.