Thom, replacing Biden, based on his uncharacteristically poor performance, would be a major mistake. It would speak to a party that is remarkably insecure in its ability to lead and govern. Biden had an off-night. But he and the Democratic party can run effectively on his and their achievements and contrast them with the dysfunctional sy…
Thom, replacing Biden, based on his uncharacteristically poor performance, would be a major mistake. It would speak to a party that is remarkably insecure in its ability to lead and govern. Biden had an off-night. But he and the Democratic party can run effectively on his and their achievements and contrast them with the dysfunctional system that they inherited from Trump. This is the time for Democrats to double-down and not quit.
Elliott as I responded to Patricia Lang. The only question is what is the best way, what has to be done to keep Trump out of power so he doesn't initiated Project 2025 and Agenda 47, all of this personal and personality stuff is irrelevant The only thing I care about is Trump staying TFG, and RFK, Cornell Est and Jill Stein driffing back into ignominy
Thom, replacing Biden, based on his uncharacteristically poor performance, would be a major mistake. It would speak to a party that is remarkably insecure in its ability to lead and govern. Biden had an off-night. But he and the Democratic party can run effectively on his and their achievements and contrast them with the dysfunctional system that they inherited from Trump. This is the time for Democrats to double-down and not quit.
Elliott Blass
Elliott as I responded to Patricia Lang. The only question is what is the best way, what has to be done to keep Trump out of power so he doesn't initiated Project 2025 and Agenda 47, all of this personal and personality stuff is irrelevant The only thing I care about is Trump staying TFG, and RFK, Cornell Est and Jill Stein driffing back into ignominy