Thom, Unknown to me at the time, I published a much shorter and less complete version of this column an hour after you did. I did have one more piece of evidence regarding the 2000 election, the potential for creating targeted hanging chad as documented in the eBook "Stolen Future".
I should also point out that the people who would use vi…
Thom, Unknown to me at the time, I published a much shorter and less complete version of this column an hour after you did. I did have one more piece of evidence regarding the 2000 election, the potential for creating targeted hanging chad as documented in the eBook "Stolen Future".
I should also point out that the people who would use violence to hold on to power--900,000 Afghanis and Iraqis dead, not to mention 7,000 Americans--seem unlikely to have hesitated in the killing of 3,000 more Americans in New York when a false flag to justify the War on Terror was staged to enrage the American public in their favor.
On September 11th three steel-superstructure high-rise buildings were completely destroyed (the first ever in the 100-year history of building skyscrapers). They fell symmetrically at--or for the Twin Towers, very nearly--freefall speed into thousands of tons of undamaged steel and concrete below the plane crash sites. Somehow the smaller/lighter tops of the Twin Towers (above the crash site) crushed the heavier/larger bottoms in violation of Newton's 3rd law of motion (...every action has an equal and opposite reaction...). Building Seven wasn't hit by a plane and still managed to destroy itself symmetrically and at full freefall. None of these observations are consistent with the characteristics of natural gravitational collapses. They are all characteristic of controlled demolitions.
Amen, Carolyn! It took me a couple of years to acknowledge what I knew intuitively on viewing the videos of the collapses on Sept. 11th. Ken Burns...this is not a set of observations I'd expect from him. That's as nicely as I know how to put it.
Thom, Unknown to me at the time, I published a much shorter and less complete version of this column an hour after you did. I did have one more piece of evidence regarding the 2000 election, the potential for creating targeted hanging chad as documented in the eBook "Stolen Future".
I should also point out that the people who would use violence to hold on to power--900,000 Afghanis and Iraqis dead, not to mention 7,000 Americans--seem unlikely to have hesitated in the killing of 3,000 more Americans in New York when a false flag to justify the War on Terror was staged to enrage the American public in their favor.
Excellent point. It’s not PC to talk about that though. Check out AE911Truth. The truth is worth searching for.
On September 11th three steel-superstructure high-rise buildings were completely destroyed (the first ever in the 100-year history of building skyscrapers). They fell symmetrically at--or for the Twin Towers, very nearly--freefall speed into thousands of tons of undamaged steel and concrete below the plane crash sites. Somehow the smaller/lighter tops of the Twin Towers (above the crash site) crushed the heavier/larger bottoms in violation of Newton's 3rd law of motion (...every action has an equal and opposite reaction...). Building Seven wasn't hit by a plane and still managed to destroy itself symmetrically and at full freefall. None of these observations are consistent with the characteristics of natural gravitational collapses. They are all characteristic of controlled demolitions.
Amen, Carolyn! It took me a couple of years to acknowledge what I knew intuitively on viewing the videos of the collapses on Sept. 11th. Ken Burns...this is not a set of observations I'd expect from him. That's as nicely as I know how to put it.