The GOP's Secret Agenda for America’s Future
It’s the second-most ancient form of governance humanity knows, described in detail in works both modern and ancient, dating all the way back to ancient Sumeria, China, Mesoamerica & Europe…
The song that was inspired by this article is available here.
My reading this article as an audio podcast is available here.
“If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace.”
—Thomas Paine, The Crisis, December 23, 1776
Marjorie Taylor Greene told Republicans at the RNC this week that Donald Trump “will make us wealthy.”
What’s she really saying? And who is “us”?
A lot of words get thrown around to describe what we can expect with a MAGA Republican administration at full strength. From “authoritarian” to “fascist” to “Christian Nationalist” and worse. However, most of these words and phrases have — for most Americans — no specific meaning and so are often just considered either a cheap slur or hyperbole.
But the reality is that the MAGA wing of the GOP (now fully in control of the Party) and the rightwing billionaires who fund the think tanks and networks that keep it alive do have a very specific idea about how America should be governed.
And there’s nothing new or modern about it.
It’s the second-most ancient form of governance humanity knows (behind democracy), described in detail in works both modern and ancient, dating all the way back to ancient Sumeria, China, Mesoamerica, and Europe; some countries incorporate it into their official names to this day.
It’s called “kingdom.”
Most people, when they think of a kingdom, think of a king: a ruler with absolute power over his subjects. Absolute immunity for all official acts. A monarch accountable to nobody except his own whims. A man who must be obeyed under all circumstances, lest dreadful consequences befall those who defy him.
And, of course, six Republicans on the Supreme Court just this month granted that very sort of power to the American presidency, an abomination completely at odds with the form of government our Founders and Framers created and generations of Americans fought and died to preserve for us, our children, and our grandchildren.
But kingdoms are also economic systems. In many regards, in fact, the economics of a kingdom are more essential to understanding how power is acquired, wielded, and held over time by the sovereign and their class — in defiance of the majority of the people — than any other single factor.
In a kingdom, like in a democratic republic, there are essentially three economic classes: the rich, the middle class, and the poor. They’re organized quite differently in these two systems, though, as history tells us.
For example, when Charles Dickens wrote A Christmas Carol he introduced us to two of those three economic classes. Ebenezer Scrooge was part of the United Kingdom’s small middle class, made up of doctors, lawyers, and small business owners. It was probably less than 3-5 percent of England’s working population, while the working poor were around 95 percent.
Dickens draws a contrast between middle-class small businessman Scrooge, with his single employee, and the mayor of London, who drew his role in society from wealth and nobility (the 1 percent of the day), when he wrote:
“The Lord Mayor, in the stronghold of the mighty Mansion House, gave orders to his fifty cooks and butlers to keep Christmas as a Lord Mayor's household should…”
In that same paragraph, Dickens describes the poor-working-class tailor’s wife as “lean” (the result of hunger) and two chapters later describes the poor-working-class lighthouse keepers thus:
“But even here, two men who watched the light had made a fire, that through the loophole in the thick stone wall shed out a ray of brightness on the awful sea. Joining their horny hands over the rough table at which they sat, they wished each other Merry Christmas in their can of grog; and one of them: the elder, too, with his face all damaged and scarred with hard weather, as the figure-head of an old ship might be...”
We’ve been reading, seeing, and hearing that iconic story for most of our lives, but few Americans ever realize how dedicated Dickens was to describing life in a kingdom where the ability to rise into the middle class was narrowly circumscribed and the working class was virtually 100% “the working poor.”
Public schools as we understand them were non-existent; only the tiny middle-class and very wealthy could send their children to attend quality private schools or university.
Sickness condemned a working-class-poor family to lifelong debt, as Dickens told us how Tiny Tim, who “bore a little crutch, and had his limbs supported by an iron frame,” kept his family in such deep poverty that his father wore “his threadbare clothes darned up and brushed, to look seasonable…”
Not only was there no minimum wage in the United Kingdom in Dickens’ 1840s; there were maximum wage laws designed specifically to prevent working poor people from rising up through the economic ranks into the middle class.
The inability to repay debt meant prison and forced labor (Dickens’ own father had been sentenced to a debtor’s prison when Charles was a child), unions were non-existent, and only the wealthy had any access whatsoever to political power or any say in the direction the nation would take.
Meanwhile, the Lord Mayors, the members of the extended royal family, and the fabulously wealthy — the one percent of the Victorian era — lived lives of opulence and wretched excess.
While they didn’t have the ability to buy multiple 700-foot yachts or shoot themselves into outer space on giant penis-shaped rockets, they certainly had the equivalent of that time.
And they rarely paid taxes. As English economist Arthur Young wrote in 1792:
“The nobility and clergy have for centuries been exempted from taxation... The nobles and clergy, by their privileges and exemption from taxes, threw all the weight of the state expenses on the people.”
This week the Republican Party is endorsing a billionaire for president and a multi-multi-millionaire hedge fund guy — the protégé of another billionaire — for vice president. If Trump and Vance are elected, under the rules defined by Republicans on the Supreme Court they’ll become our first king and king-in-waiting.
To accomplish this, their platform and other efforts include extending and increasing massive tax cuts for the very rich, gutting public schools, purging the military and academia of the “radical left,” and throwing over 10 million people into concentration camps.
Forty years of Reaganomics have taken our middle class from almost two-thirds of us in 1980 to fewer than half of us today; Republicans want to further impoverish working class people by gutting unions, crushing small entrepreneurial businesses through blocking enforcement of anti-trust laws, and eliminating minimum wage laws altogether.
The working poor were fewer than a third of us when Reagan came into office; 43 years of Reaganomics later, the working poor are more than half of Americans. And if Trump and Vance get their way, we’ll be heading even faster toward Dickens’ 95 percent.
Republicans are so dedicated to keeping working class people poor and locked into their social strata they even went all the way to the Supreme Court to prevent President Biden from lessening the burden of student debt, a problem that literally does not exist in any other developed nation in the world.
Similarly, last year there were about a half-million families destroyed by medical debt bankruptcy across the entire developed world; nearly every one of those was here in the US. When President Biden proposed simply blocking credit agencies from downgrading families with medical debt, Republicans immediately opposed his effort.
When five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court legalized political bribery — opening the door to billionaires like Musk giving $45 million a month to Trump’s election efforts — they guaranteed that what remains of our democracy (we’re the only developed country in the world that allows such corruption) finds itself under continuous assault.
As Thomas Jefferson (who died in bankruptcy) wrote about the monetary obsessions of the morbidly rich to John Adams (lifelong member of the middle class) on January 24, 1814:
“You might as well, with the sailors, whistle to the wind, as suggest precautions against having too much money. We must scud then before the gale, and try to hold fast, ourselves, by some plank of the wreck.”
Call it what you want, the GOP is nakedly zealous about turning America from a democratic republic into a kingdom. And the rightwing billionaires and their corporations are doing everything they can to make it happen.
Our last chance to rescue democracy may well come this November. Vote!
And please tell me why the Middle Class and poor fall for this
Monarchy may be the second oldest form of government, but doesn’t history show that autocracy is by far the most common form of it? Especially in diverse entities? Think of the Roman, Mongol, and the French and especially the British Empires. Perhaps there is a point at which a polity becomes too diverse for democracy to function, when its interests and fault zones are so varied that the morbidly rich and the craven find irresistible the opportunity to seize power. Until they overreach, and the subjugated populace or a significant enough segment of it rises up, rebels, and breaks loose to start the cycle over again.
It may be our misfortune to be at the end of a noble and aspirationally good experiment in that cycle. I have no other obvious explanation for why a person and a cult based on false victimhood, hate, anger, bigotry, cruelty and defiant ignorance could have taken such hold here. Yes, in the computer age there are foreign autocratic enemies stoking the flames, but there have been variations of that assaulting republics and democracies through history as well.
It will take a Herculean effort to hold back the forces of darkness in November. As each day passes, I lose more hope. Especially as I see even people very close to me embrace the darkness. I take no solace in the knowledge that until my much desired and if I am lucky near demise, me and my family will not suffer much. We will stay in the Dickensian 3%. But I have never thought much of material things for myself. I have always had this weakness, by the standards of those others, that I care to much about the plight of others less fortunate, having been in their ranks during my first 25 years.
If we are to fall, let us fight to the end. And know that if we lose in November, our work is just changing to one of resistance, with all that entails. It is sad to regret that our grandson, the adored center of our lives since his birth, was ever born. He will have a blighted future, or none at all if our species finally destroys itself and the planet. We cannot yield. No matter what. Whatever happens, the morbidly rich and the corrupt must never be allowed to rest easily or peacefully in their beds if the worst befalls us. I pray it does not come to that.