We don''t need foreign investments. They use American labor and keep the profits for themselves. Saudi Arabia is wealthy because of American dollars, and the American Military Industrial complex.
The Constitution mentions the general welfare twice, just another term of the common good.
Anything that serves the public, regardless of class, …
We don''t need foreign investments. They use American labor and keep the profits for themselves. Saudi Arabia is wealthy because of American dollars, and the American Military Industrial complex.
The Constitution mentions the general welfare twice, just another term of the common good.
Anything that serves the public, regardless of class, income, gender, race, religion is the commons, be it utilities, transportation. national defense, land (parks), and oil production and refinement.
The problem with government control is bureaucracies, conservatism, and politics. Government departments or bureaucacies are notoriously conservative and resistant to change, change means loss of power, authority, and jobs.
The problem with private ownership is the same, on top of which is that they are profit driven and that means reducing labor, reducing or eliminating investment in R&D, and deferred maintenance which leads to outages, breakdowns, deterioration of infrastructure, as has happened to privately owned toll roads.
The question is which is the lesser of two evils. I go for government control and private ownership in the form of co ops.
But yes, we should nationalize the oil refineries like yesterday. The problem is our politicians and jurists are the best that money can buy.
Saudi Arabia is a major stockholder in Exxon.
The deluded Hugo Chavez had the temerity to think that Venezuelan oil belonged to Venezuela and not Exxon, and had the audacity to nationalize the oil fields and production.
Well, Exxon, was outraged, how dare he do something so audacious, so they showed him, they pulled the strings they have with the U.S. Government, and embarked upon a campaign to destablize Venezuela and install an Exxon friendly puppet via a coup and actual CIA action.
An unrelenting campaign, finally in 2019 with Trump in power, the U.S. embargoed Venezuelan oil.
CITGO Headquartered in the Energy Corridor area of Houston, it is majority-owned by PDVSA, a state-owned company of the Venezuelan government (although due to U.S. sanctions in 2019, they no longer economically benefit from CITGO.
When the Saudis and the oil cabal were extorting us, CITGO undercut them to drive the price down, and Trump stepped in to sanction Venezuelan oil.
Google is your friend. Do some wisely worded searches like SABIC, Exxon and you will find a number of joint venture projects,in Texas, between Exxon and SABIC (Saudi Arabia Basic Industries Corporation).
They are buying up and monopolizing America, with our money, when they aren't buying multi million dollars properties from Trump, or financing Donald and Jareds ventures and legal penalties
Not sure you're right about not needing foreign investment. A whole lot of the world's wealth is tied up in US dollars and dollar denominated securities. Probably not a good thing if it all freaked out and left.
We don''t need foreign investments. They use American labor and keep the profits for themselves. Saudi Arabia is wealthy because of American dollars, and the American Military Industrial complex.
The Constitution mentions the general welfare twice, just another term of the common good.
Anything that serves the public, regardless of class, income, gender, race, religion is the commons, be it utilities, transportation. national defense, land (parks), and oil production and refinement.
The problem with government control is bureaucracies, conservatism, and politics. Government departments or bureaucacies are notoriously conservative and resistant to change, change means loss of power, authority, and jobs.
The problem with private ownership is the same, on top of which is that they are profit driven and that means reducing labor, reducing or eliminating investment in R&D, and deferred maintenance which leads to outages, breakdowns, deterioration of infrastructure, as has happened to privately owned toll roads.
The question is which is the lesser of two evils. I go for government control and private ownership in the form of co ops.
But yes, we should nationalize the oil refineries like yesterday. The problem is our politicians and jurists are the best that money can buy.
Saudi Arabia is a major stockholder in Exxon.
The deluded Hugo Chavez had the temerity to think that Venezuelan oil belonged to Venezuela and not Exxon, and had the audacity to nationalize the oil fields and production.
Well, Exxon, was outraged, how dare he do something so audacious, so they showed him, they pulled the strings they have with the U.S. Government, and embarked upon a campaign to destablize Venezuela and install an Exxon friendly puppet via a coup and actual CIA action.
An unrelenting campaign, finally in 2019 with Trump in power, the U.S. embargoed Venezuelan oil.
CITGO Headquartered in the Energy Corridor area of Houston, it is majority-owned by PDVSA, a state-owned company of the Venezuelan government (although due to U.S. sanctions in 2019, they no longer economically benefit from CITGO.
When the Saudis and the oil cabal were extorting us, CITGO undercut them to drive the price down, and Trump stepped in to sanction Venezuelan oil.
Google is your friend. Do some wisely worded searches like SABIC, Exxon and you will find a number of joint venture projects,in Texas, between Exxon and SABIC (Saudi Arabia Basic Industries Corporation).
They are buying up and monopolizing America, with our money, when they aren't buying multi million dollars properties from Trump, or financing Donald and Jareds ventures and legal penalties
Not sure you're right about not needing foreign investment. A whole lot of the world's wealth is tied up in US dollars and dollar denominated securities. Probably not a good thing if it all freaked out and left.
Correct, and it is too late to do anything about it. It really is