As a Canadian, I have an outsider's view. I marvel at how Thom keeps track of all these details, but I guess that's the many years of journalistic experience he has. I too have been suspicious of Barr (obviously), and wonder at his motives for being so vocal of late in a somewhat paradoxical role of condemning Trump, but also of not wa…
As a Canadian, I have an outsider's view. I marvel at how Thom keeps track of all these details, but I guess that's the many years of journalistic experience he has. I too have been suspicious of Barr (obviously), and wonder at his motives for being so vocal of late in a somewhat paradoxical role of condemning Trump, but also of not wanting to see him indicted. I can only wonder - is he attempting to muddy the waters of evidence of criminality that are showing up? or perhaps to have some desired effect on attitudes of the lawyers, justices, and Trump's base knowing what lays in store for the Trump team? Is it all an attempt to cover up his own involvement in it all? I'll continue to watch Barr's words and actions for clues, and to enjoy Thom's insights. I do find it fascinating how Republicans have managed to keep so much criminal behavior under wraps; now that there's a Democratic president and an independent AG again, we're beginning to see the rot that's been working against the American public by those in higher offices.
Isn't it fun. If USA wasn't so close to Canada and the MAGAts oligarch funders working hard to export it here, We could just sit back and feel smug. However with Poilievre heading the Convoy Party, backed with a great deal of money from eg The Plymouth Brethren, we must be on our guard. Our constitution and parliamentary system MAY be more monkey proof but I'm never 100% confident in that.
As a Canadian, I have an outsider's view. I marvel at how Thom keeps track of all these details, but I guess that's the many years of journalistic experience he has. I too have been suspicious of Barr (obviously), and wonder at his motives for being so vocal of late in a somewhat paradoxical role of condemning Trump, but also of not wanting to see him indicted. I can only wonder - is he attempting to muddy the waters of evidence of criminality that are showing up? or perhaps to have some desired effect on attitudes of the lawyers, justices, and Trump's base knowing what lays in store for the Trump team? Is it all an attempt to cover up his own involvement in it all? I'll continue to watch Barr's words and actions for clues, and to enjoy Thom's insights. I do find it fascinating how Republicans have managed to keep so much criminal behavior under wraps; now that there's a Democratic president and an independent AG again, we're beginning to see the rot that's been working against the American public by those in higher offices.
Isn't it fun. If USA wasn't so close to Canada and the MAGAts oligarch funders working hard to export it here, We could just sit back and feel smug. However with Poilievre heading the Convoy Party, backed with a great deal of money from eg The Plymouth Brethren, we must be on our guard. Our constitution and parliamentary system MAY be more monkey proof but I'm never 100% confident in that.