Look, I like you. Your posts, which are full of historical reference, mostly pertinent, sometimes seeming a bit braggadocio, but I am totally tolerant of style. These formats cannot, should not tolerate personal dramas
The times call for serious endeavors and expressions re dire, very real threats. What say you? Willing to stop the personals? Stick to the salient?
Look, I like you. Your posts, which are full of historical reference, mostly pertinent, sometimes seeming a bit braggadocio, but I am totally tolerant of style. These formats cannot, should not tolerate personal dramas
The times call for serious endeavors and expressions re dire, very real threats. What say you? Willing to stop the personals? Stick to the salient?
Now that is a comment with which I concur, even your assessment of bragadacio. Unavoidable, when making controversial comments, often relying on personal experience, but anticipating challenges.
I never attacked you personally. I agree with the thrust of your comments, I really do. I was, so I thought, just offering some friendly advise as to how to ensure your comments are read by others.
Another poster, actually more thanone, has taken umbrage with me, because I critique their style, which is a strong of consciousness, a long, long paragraph,much in the style of Jack Kerouac'sOn the Road, 320 pages, one paragraph, not evenline breaks, reads like the Torah.
TL:DR
Paragraph's should be short, for eye rest, one, contain one subject,not five,ten or twenty.
I've mentioned Liberty Forum before. There was a woman on it, Askel5, a Catholic, self righteous burdened with guilt because she had an abortion when younger. her postings were homilies, full of adjectives and non sequiturs. The only people who enjoyed them were people like her, who belonged to the same cult
My intentions,Gerald,were honorable, I was just trying to be helpful.
Look, I like you. Your posts, which are full of historical reference, mostly pertinent, sometimes seeming a bit braggadocio, but I am totally tolerant of style. These formats cannot, should not tolerate personal dramas
The times call for serious endeavors and expressions re dire, very real threats. What say you? Willing to stop the personals? Stick to the salient?
Tolerate the cadences of all?
Now that is a comment with which I concur, even your assessment of bragadacio. Unavoidable, when making controversial comments, often relying on personal experience, but anticipating challenges.
I never attacked you personally. I agree with the thrust of your comments, I really do. I was, so I thought, just offering some friendly advise as to how to ensure your comments are read by others.
Another poster, actually more thanone, has taken umbrage with me, because I critique their style, which is a strong of consciousness, a long, long paragraph,much in the style of Jack Kerouac'sOn the Road, 320 pages, one paragraph, not evenline breaks, reads like the Torah.
TL:DR
Paragraph's should be short, for eye rest, one, contain one subject,not five,ten or twenty.
I've mentioned Liberty Forum before. There was a woman on it, Askel5, a Catholic, self righteous burdened with guilt because she had an abortion when younger. her postings were homilies, full of adjectives and non sequiturs. The only people who enjoyed them were people like her, who belonged to the same cult
My intentions,Gerald,were honorable, I was just trying to be helpful.