The supreme court acts in accord with its majority despite the law. I too will be willing to be surprised in the present majority in following the law rather than their open political desires. The fact is the role of the supreme court in these matters is no role. State officers determine candidacy legal rights and the ONLY appeal is the …
The supreme court acts in accord with its majority despite the law. I too will be willing to be surprised in the present majority in following the law rather than their open political desires. The fact is the role of the supreme court in these matters is no role. State officers determine candidacy legal rights and the ONLY appeal is the senate as a court to vote on pardon. Nothing else matters even the supreme court.
In aftermath of arguments coverage, I note that 6-day evidentiary hearing and fact-finding of lower court seems to have been blown-off, which to me flies in the face of what "appellate" is supposed to mean. It's not, fundamentally, supposed to be about re-interpreting, or speculating, or dissing-off, the fact-finding based on due process (which there was in Colorado). So the great champions of "States Rights" are absolutely selecting the rights of States to oppress fertile females, but not so much to manage Constitutional elections.
The supreme court acts in accord with its majority despite the law. I too will be willing to be surprised in the present majority in following the law rather than their open political desires. The fact is the role of the supreme court in these matters is no role. State officers determine candidacy legal rights and the ONLY appeal is the senate as a court to vote on pardon. Nothing else matters even the supreme court.
In aftermath of arguments coverage, I note that 6-day evidentiary hearing and fact-finding of lower court seems to have been blown-off, which to me flies in the face of what "appellate" is supposed to mean. It's not, fundamentally, supposed to be about re-interpreting, or speculating, or dissing-off, the fact-finding based on due process (which there was in Colorado). So the great champions of "States Rights" are absolutely selecting the rights of States to oppress fertile females, but not so much to manage Constitutional elections.