Is Fox News "The Greatest Cancer on American Democracy"?
If our media and body politic are infected with a cancer it’s time to isolate it so it can’t further harm our democracy and, by extension, the democracies of the world
(For the “Daily Audio” of Thom reading this article, available only to paid subscribers, check the “Daily Audio” tab on HartmannReport.com.)
What country in its right mind would allow a foreign entity to come into their country, set up a major propaganda operation, and then use it to so polarize that nation that its very government suffers a violent assault and its democracy finds itself at a crossroads?
Apparently, the United States. And we’re not the first, according to former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.
Writing for The Sydney Morning Herald (the Australian equivalent of The New York Times) Rudd called Rupert Murdoch and his rightwing news operations “the greatest cancer on the Australian democracy.”
“The uncomfortable truth is,” Rudd wrote, “since the coup of June 2010, Australian politics has become vicious, toxic and unstable. The core question is why?”
While Rudd calls out the Australian equivalents of Gym Jordan and Marjorie Taylor Greene, the focus of his article and the damage done by the “coup” within his party in 2010 is Murdoch.
Noting that, “Murdoch owns two-thirds of the country’s print media,” Rudd added:
“Murdoch is not just a news organisation. Murdoch operates as a political party, acting in pursuit of clearly defined commercial interests, in addition to his far-right ideological world view.”
Brexit happened in the UK because of the newspapers and media Murdoch owns there, Rudd wrote, and:
“In the United States, Murdoch’s Fox News is the political echo chamber of the far right, which enabled the Tea Party and then the Trump party to stage a hostile takeover of the Republican Party.”
Murdoch’s positions weren’t at all ambiguous, Rudd noted. They’re simply pro-billionaire/pro-oligarch and thus, by extension, anti-democracy.
“In Australia, as in America,” he wrote, “Murdoch has campaigned for decades in support of tax cuts for the wealthy, killing action on climate change and destroying anything approximating multiculturalism.
“Given Murdoch's impact on the future of our democracy,” Rudd added, “it's time to revisit it.”
Here in America, Fox “News” has had such a powerful influence on American politics that its creation, President Donald Trump, apparently even ordered government agencies to show it on their in-house TVs.
MoveOn.org, one of our nation’s top activist groups, launched a petition drive to remove Fox from military bases around the world, an effort supported by large numbers of active duty military.
Fox and Murdoch’s power come, Rudd says, from their ruthlessness.
“Murdoch is also a political bully and a thug,” former Australian Prime Minister Rudd writes, “who for many years has hired bullies as his editors. The message to Australian politicians is clear: either toe the line on what Murdoch wants or he kills you politically.
“This has produced a cowering, fearful political culture across the country. I know dozens of politicians, business leaders, academics and journalists, both left and right, too frightened to take Murdoch on because they fear the repercussions for them personally. They have seen what happens to people who have challenged Murdoch’s interests as Murdoch then sets out to destroy them.”
When Fox set out to rewrite the history of the treasonous January 6th coup attempt at our nation’s Capitol with a three-part special alleging it could have been an inside job by the FBI, two of their top conservative stars, Jonah Goldberg and Stephen Hayes, resigned in protest.
Text messages released this week by Congresswoman Liz Cheney and the committee investigating the January 6th attempt to overthrow our government show that the network’s top prime-time hosts were begging Trump to call off his mob while at the same time minimizing what happened on the air.
Steve Schmidt, a man who’s definitely not a liberal (he was a White House advisor to George W. Bush and ran Bush’s 2004 re-election campaign as well as John McCain’s 2008 campaign), has been blunt about the impact of Fox “News”:
“Rupert Murdoch’s lie machine is directly responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans, the poisoning of our democracy and the stoking of a cold civil war. There has never been anything like it and it is beyond terrible for the country. Bar none, Rupert Murdoch is the worst and most dangerous immigrant to ever arrive on American soil. There are no words for the awfulness of his cancerous network.”
While Jen Psaki has been humorous in her dealing with Fox’s Peter Doocy’s attempts at gotcha questions in the White House press room, there’s nothing funny about inciting attacks on our country and then openly lying on the air about “antifa” to cover it up, as Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented.
“Banishing from polite company” is a phrase that came from a different era, but it’s time to ask if Fox has grown to such destructive dimensions that our government’s press rooms should stop recognizing them as a legitimate “news” organization and our military should reconsider its impact on our troops.
As my SiriusXM colleague Michelangelo Signorile points out, even “real news” guy Chris Wallace has jumped ship.
To continue with Rudd’s metaphor, if our media and body politic are infected with a cancer it’s time to isolate it so it can’t further harm our democracy and, by extension, the democracies of the world.
Thanks Thom,
Fox is the primary symptom of the cancer, but it is not THE cancer.
How is it that oligarchs, like Murdoch, were able to create tools for spreading their poison and use it to divide an distract us from the real cancer? What system enabled this?
Over the decades, America's current, third-batch, of authoritarian oligarchs, along with their puppet politicians, as you have documented in you Hidden History books, have undone many protections for our democracy.
The cancer attacking our democratic political system is , as Professor Richard Wolff points out, our authoritarian (employer/employee) economic system. On the one hand, this corrupted economic system has empowered the oligarchs with extreme wealth that has allowed them to purchase and reward politicians. On the other, these political puppets, like McConnell, Manchen and Sinema, have further empowered the oligarchs with more excessive wealth through legislating tax cuts, increasing our WAR budget and maintaining corporate welfare. The oligarchs, with their extremely excessive wealth, are working, for the third time since 1861, to reshape or political system in their own authoritarian image using the media they own.
We're in a cycle, as you have discussed, where oligarchs attempt a coup, lose the battle, learn from their coup rehearsals and try again. We need a permanent end to this cycle, not just regualtory push back to square one to start over. Their accumulation of wealth from our authoritarian economic system needs to be permanently disabled. Unlike previous attempts that just re-regulate an authoritarian system. The oligarchs know how to remove those restaints.
A more permanent fix that includes elimination of their wealth and prevention of any future accumulation. We need a wealth tax to neuter the oligarchs now. We need, as Professor Wollf promotes, more democracy in the workplace at the heart of our authoritarian economic system. We need to repeal Taft-Hartley, allow union representation votes without corporate delay, add significant union membership on corporate boards of directors, and enable replacing most non-democratic employer/employee business models with employee owned business models - coops. We also need to eliminate profit from our MSM, like FreeSpeech TV.
Employees of coops will not send their own jobs overseas. Employees of coops will distribute their profit in a more democratic manner and eliminate the possibility of an oligarch in their midst. Employees of coops will not pullute the communities they work in.
Authoritarian capitalism is our cancer and curring this cancer is done with a permananty infusion of democracy in the workplace. Just as we need a democratic political system we need a democratic economic system to reinforce that political system.
What is there left to say about Fox News and Rupert? Murdoch is a sociopath billionaire whose success depends on a certain portion of the public that's eager to be lied to. It's a match made in hell. They view the world in a binary fashion, they want quick decisions, solutions, and no dithering. A big strong man will know what to do; investigating is not necessary.
Isolation is not an option because of that free-speech-thing everyone loves. Besides, getting rid of Rupert and his FOX will not get rid of the monster they have created---their audience.
The fans will refuse the medication if it involves a good dose of reality. Just like our American history, reality sucks, so they would rather listen to lies.