46 Comments

It is definitely the question of our day. It's Christmas and I remember vividly 60 years ago visiting the Agnew institution for mentally ill. Agnew was a sprawling facility located in what is now called Silicon Valley in Calif. The facility was along the southern end of San Francisco bay where Sun Microsystems and Google later located (I imagine getting beneficial tax treatments).

I was a young boy scout and our troop organized a holiday party for one of the wards. We setup and helped decorate a tree, sang some songs, passed out cookies/drinks and shared small gifts while mingling (best we could). I recall the building was well maintained and everyone participated in singing and enjoying their evening. Yes, some were 'slow' but their enjoyment was obvious.

Gov. Reagan signed the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act in 1967 which shutdown Agnew and all other mental illness facilities in CA. The act was clothed in language about the abuse, mistreatment and legal institutionalization of individuals against their will. Almost certainly there was truth in that objective. The slight of hand here was the act relied on being replaced with 'community treatment centers'. Those centers were never funded.

As a direct consequence of this Act, the number of mentally ill in jails doubled the following year. Small crimes resulted in incarceration. The prisoner was given food, a place to sleep and medication. Once stable they were released only to repeat the cycle.

Later, -as mentioned in this report- Reagan repeated this slight of hand nationwide. I remember well as veterans were returning with mental illness they also became trapped in this identical cycle. I have seen well how the country has been responding even today to the homeless. I have seen it in our wealthy Silicon Valley cities and how the homeless are demonized.

And I think back to a Christmas 60 years ago.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Dec 16, 2022Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment

I would add that the DOJ was spineless not prosecuting for civil rights violations and forcing the issue to be taken out of the local bias.

Expand full comment

That judge was not impartial. He threw out the misdemeanor charge of a minor carrying a gun across state lines which cut the legs off the case. Now Rittenhouse is being called a hero and being romanced from the far right. They’ve created a monster and I’m sure in his young life he will have plenty of years to evolve into another right wing nutbag.

Expand full comment

I come across so many people that still believe Reagan was the greatest president ever. Blows my mind.

Expand full comment

Sadly, Thom, I am not optimistic. We have evolved into an over schooled/under educated society of nincompoops who commonly worship sports heroes and babbling politicians.

I am an 85 year old duffer who won't be here long enough to see the final drop. There is something good about that.

On the bright side, my recently adopted 13-year-old cat has accepted me as a friend.

Expand full comment

Bless you Scupper, and I am an atheist, I am 83 and could not agree more. Double blessings for adopting a 13 year old cat I am a cat person and have four, well the fourth is a barn cat that adopted us, comes in at night to sleep, get breakfast, then goes out to feed himself on rodents,which requires a monthly deworning, as rodents carry tapeworm larvae.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your blessings, William. I appreciate any that don't require me to put cash in the alms plate. I am also quite free from any beliefs in mythical characters with the exception of the Tooth Fairey and the Easter Bunny whose symbiotic relationship I've studied for many years. By the way, any barn cat not needing periodic de-worming, is a fraud.

Expand full comment

I did have a cat I rescued out of a woodpile, abandoned as a kitten, who moved over to a neighbor years later because he was so mad at me worming him. C'est la vie.

Expand full comment

Hah! Isn't this fun! One of the two best cats in my life was a barn cat who decided to move in by yowling through the roof vent of my temporary Airstream home, and never missed the cat box subsequently. It makes sense that atheism would be consanguineous with catness.

Expand full comment

Well, aren’t cats gods? At least they think they are.

Expand full comment

They may think that they are gods but their understanding of "godlike" must include snuggling and belly rubs.

Expand full comment

The cat knows the Force is with you. I humbly suggest you put out some optimistic ideas. I am only 69, but I have had enough weird "manifestations" ("coincidences?") to respect possibilities. You sound like a guy with good ideas. It's an interesting universe.

Expand full comment

Another great article. Thank you. I must point out that these fascists greatest tool has been and continues to be religion. The Reagan problem stemmed from integrating the fundamentalists into the Republican Party. Our problems now have the same root. By stacking the SCOTUS with theocrats, they have already destroyed our national unity.

Expand full comment

Even Hitler girded himself in Christianity. There used to be the old saying: "opium of the masses." In practice, it is more the "terrible swift sword." We used to sing "The Battle Hymn..." for innocent fun when I was a kid.

Expand full comment

I am certain, that as a 70 year old man, I will not live to see this horrific tide I have watched since I was a young adult be reversed. I am prepared to watch an increase in hate and division, as severe as it is now, get even worse before it gets better. I want to believe it could not happen, but as each day goes by, I am more convinced it will get worse. I seriously hope I am wrong!

Expand full comment

Dear 70 from 69: remember the geographical divisions of this passage of history, and remember that the overarching numbers favor hope. We can't do anything about the bizarre disconnect that in the Senate, one Wyomingite has the same representation as roughly 69,000 Californians. and yet, voters of good heart and mind held the Senate, and the Good Fight is not over. I have an aunt about to turn 104, so don't give up what you gonna see.....

Expand full comment

This is the best rundown of what Reagan did to us that I ever have seen. I've shared it as widely as I can.

Expand full comment

I have tried communicating with the cult members. They only listen to their news sources. If we are to reach them I would say it will need to be in 15 seconds commercial spots on television.

Expand full comment

In states where massive numbers of voters have been purged, or otherwise suppressed, has anyone, or any group of voters filed lawsuits demanding that the government prove their votes were counted? Regardless of the ballot secrecy, it is both morally compelling, and practically and technically feasible that our government prove to any/all individuals that their vote was counted.

And prove that their vote was counted correctly.

Every year our government demands each of us prove our income to the penny. It is reasonable and fair that we demand our government prove to us that our votes were counted correctly.

Expand full comment

But your nation has been "saved" -- the U.S. is now the No.1 supplier to the world of arms and, as Thom Linden writes, the mentally ill are now roaming the streets. I read in this morning's news about Japan doubling its defense budget, and India testing missiles -- all good for the U.S. economy. All these things are necessary if the world is to get to what Rudolf Steiner called "the war of All against All". How are you going to turn this tide of events? Personally, I'm going to work on Plan "B".

Expand full comment

Rudolph Steiner. A significant and fascinating character. Leading scholar (Goethe) and leading spiritualist, (Blavatsky) It seems the Kali Yuga may not have ended in 1900. What's your plan B?

Expand full comment

Interesting summation of Steiner - scholar and spiritualist. Plan B is to seek the kingdom that Christ Jesus spoke about; it's a kingdom that is unshakable, unlike our current heavens and earth, which can be shaken (Isaiah 54:10).

Expand full comment

What’s plan B?

Expand full comment

Got it.

Expand full comment

The only way to save humankind from its left-brain, rivalrous tribalism, which gave rise to the neoliberal NWO, is to WITHDRAW into small, collaborating communities and stop buying the multinationals’ goods and services. To support incrimentalism is to be complicitous in the prevailing context, which is omnicidal.

Expand full comment

100% get it. The HOW is daunting. I know a place that could support such a community, but it is in the midst of a nationally famous surrounding redneck/Q/State of Jefferson larger "community." It's like, is your community adequately armed? Terrible!

Expand full comment

We're working on it. No arms, just consumer dollars. I'm on Facebook. Carry on.

Expand full comment

For a great book about the Bush/Cheney era, get a copy of Ron Suskind’s “The Way of the World”. Your blood will boil to get the inside scoop on just how corrupt, cynical, and perverted they were. Preventing a repeat is only possible if enough people understand how these people and corporations operate, and then raise a lot of hell.

At the risk of being accused of beating a dead horse, splitting hairs, and horrible heresy, I offer the following points. The people got hornswaggled really badly for decades, and only the people can reverse this treacherous trend away from any semblance of equality and from democracy. The Mid-term elections gave us reason to hope. But legislators can only do so much and hope without action and meaningful change backed by public support is self-delusion. The Jan. 6th report and referrals and indictments will also give us an injection of optimism in the near future. It must not end in complacency and apathy.

Back to my obsession. Our colleges and universities have largely been co-opted. They are far too dependent on and closely tied to corporations. They are glorified junior high schools. Research that should be accessible is locked behind pay walls.

Public school teachers can be made into scapegoats only because they are part of a political state apparatus working within the bureaucracy established to comply with state law. They are government agents. Once again, the solution is not privatization. The solution is to eliminate the attendance law to get the government out of the role of setting the parameters of and definitions for “education” and socialization. Expertise in education or in schooling is pure pretension. Education is not a science and curriculum should not EVER be dictated by or designed by people with axes to grind and positions to protect as officials. Let me repeat: We have state schools, not public schools.

This is illustrated by a call today by a caller who advised of a new law or statute requiring courses in “critical thinking”, I believe he was calling from IL. One logically assumes that this is at least a good start toward the elusive goal of critically thinking citizens. It may be better than nothing or totally ignoring the issue. However, they may as well begin requiring courses in breathing, walking, or just in thinking. Critical thinking skills are developed through practice, experience, observation, private rumination, reading extensively and reading diverse material, and living in a real world, as opposed to one artificially created by egotistical nerds and academicians. Sorry.

This is the kind of error that has come from the myth that schools can educate. That myth is then immediately compounded by the myth that children can be forced to go to school to become educated. This is how we got Reagan in the first place. This is the root cause of authoritarianism and variations of supremacy. Most of those right-wing extremists learned their lessons very well in their schools. To obey is to be a good citizen. To complete assignments is to obey and keep busy. Too busy for critical thinking. And then there is homework. Thinking can wait. Grades, evaluation, and diplomas are just too important.

Expand full comment

The first blow against unions was the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 that allowed non-union workers to reap the benefits of collective bargaining without having to pay union dues. President Truman's veto was overriden by Congress with both Republicans and Democrats happy to serve the elites.

Expand full comment

Mr. Hartmann please REVIEW MY GUT INSIGHT, I’m a daily follower and plan if I haven’t already BE A PAYING MEMBER, your a NATIONAL TREASURE an a part of my THERAPY TO STAY SANE🌈😉🌈

Interesting, I’m NOT A CONSPIRACY embracer, I came up with this INSANE INSIGHT MYSELF, NOT seen, hear, ANYTHING REGARDING this THEORY. So, I’m NOT OFFENDED, I deeply concern HOW EVIL, DEEP THE BILLIONAIRES & REPUBLICANS WILL GO to DESTROY Biden Administration…Are you REALLY LISTENING, FOLLOWING republicans DANGEROUS AGENDA TO IGNORE, ATTACK FOR THE 2 YEARS? Please don’t THINK BELIEVE I about an BULL CONSPIRACY MORON THEORIES, if you have FOLLOWED ME, there is NOTHING I have posted ACCEPTING REPUBLICAN, EVIL, DESTRUCTIVE GOAL that are TO DESTROY OUR DEMOCRACY!

Call Rep. Lieu & Senator Padilla, V.P. Harris, Rep. Raskin:

The massive invaders at the border!

I called both Rep. Lieu and senator Padilla, to share my thoughts regarding the invaders at the border. It occurs to me that this could be a contrived well planned disruption by republican BILLIONAIRES to benefit them to dissemination of President Biden’s administration. Is there any investigation regarding the CARTEL or an Corrupt organization possibly connected to Republican Billionaires that are fronting this onslaught of all these numerous immigrants to invade in mass of course there is always CHARGES, DEEP COST to these immigrants, could be an orchestrated plan by a republican billionaires funding CARTEL OR ANOTHER Corrupt organization to cause CHAOS, disrupt President Biden’s success to date and could be part of the REPUBLICANS CHAOS agenda, planned as they are about to position themselves in power grab in the House.

Expand full comment

William Farrar

1 min ago

You discredit yourself by the overuse of capitol letters, and your plea for attention.

As regards the invaders at the border. Well liberals are being led astray by emotions.

First the Venezuelans are well to do middle class, not economically or socially deprived and marginalized. These are the people that benefited from the old status quo, when Exxon Mobil had possession of Venezuelan oil as if it was theirs.

Chavez told Exxon Mobil to go fly a kite, that the oil belonged to Venezuela, and Exxon Mobil did what all large corporations have done, is used the financial and military might of this country to overthrow the government and return the oil to Exxon Mobil.

That is all there is to it, now the fat, idle, smug Venezuelan middle class has lost it's financial and political power and flees to the United States

Secondly.Liberals are burying their heads in the sand. Latin Americans are ultra conservative, very religious Catholics or Evangelicals and as such are ultra homophobic, misogynistic and patriarchal, and are natural allies of the religious right, the Christian nationalists and in fact once assimilated tend to vote with the right wing, even ignoring the racism, or rationalizing it away, because in the order of things (Maslow's hierarchy) the primary identity issue centers around the male role in the family and society. They sublimate group identity problems to personal identity needs.

Expand full comment

Did not know this about the expat Venezuelans, but this fits them in with Florida's Cubans, evicted from their plantations by Castro and forever a knee-jerk vote for whoever sez they hate commies. Beyond that, your portrayal of "natural allies of the religious right" also rings true.

Expand full comment

Your question contains the answer---pluralistic. At some stage, maybe after our time, voting blocks will wrest this nation from the cold-dead-hands of the old white guys. Women are rising (especially in colleges), minorities are rising, and so is consciousness.

Binge worthy or cringe worthy there is a lesson in everything. Use what you learn to teach someone who is LISTENING.

I'm not in as much doubt about where we are going, because I am listening to younger voices. The activists are amazing: brave, kind, full of love for the planet and all kinds of  people. Gee whiz, I wonder who taught them that!?

Reagan's ideas are not Gen Z's jam. I think they are figuring out the economics too.

Expand full comment

One wonders if Gore’s election, but for the Nader 3rd party run that allowed the Supreme Court to intervene, would have been early enough to reverse the Reagan horrors.

Expand full comment

Oh, stop with the Ralph Nader. I almost don't want to honor it with a response, but even Pat Buchanan said he got as many votes by accident. How about we focus on the "states rights" Supreme Court suddenly deciding a State Supreme Court didn't have the right to interpret that State's election laws? That stick in your craw?

Expand full comment

I seem to have touched a nerve. The US Supreme Court ripped the election from Gore. But would that opportunity arisen without Nader’s vote. I guess I’m assuming that the Nader vote would have gone to Gore but that seems reasonable.

Here is what I found on the voting #s: “ The 2000 presidential election popular vote totals in Florida were George W. Bush 2,912,790, Al Gore 2,912,253 and Ralph Nader 97,488.” Kindly help me understand why the Nader vote was immaterial.

Expand full comment

Rats! Hope I'm not duplicating. I guess I'll go ahead and start with the Commission on Civil Rights report link, and then more meat of the matter from The Nation. I was going to let it go, but got curious about auld lang syne....

https://www.usccr.gov/files/pubs/vote2000/report/exesum.htm

and from: https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/how-the-2000-election-in-florida-led-to-a-new-wave-of-voter-disenfranchisement/

Hanging chads, butterfly ballots, the antics of Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris, and thousands of Jews accidentally voting for Pat Buchanan in Palm Beach were among the stories that captured the headlines during the chaotic 36-day Florida recount between Al Gore and George W. Bush. The widespread and wrongful purging of registered voters was the most consequential—and least discussed—aspect of the Florida election.

The NAACP sued Florida after the election for violating the Voting Rights Act (VRA). As a result of the settlement, the company that the Florida legislature entrusted with the purge—the Boca Raton–based Database Technologies (DBT)—ran the names on its 2000 purge list using stricter criteria. The exercise turned up 12,000 voters who shouldn’t have been labeled felons. That was 22 times Bush’s 537-vote margin of victory.

No one could ever determine precisely how many voters who were incorrectly labeled felons were turned away from the polls. But the US Civil Rights Commission launched a major investigation into the 2000 election fiasco, and its acting general counsel, Edward Hailes, did the math the best that he could. If 12,000 voters were wrongly purged from the rolls, and 44 percent of them were African-American, and 90 percent of African-Americans voted for Gore, that meant 4,752 black Gore voters—almost nine times Bush’s margin of victory—could have been prevented from voting. It’s not a stretch to conclude that the purge cost Gore the election. “We did think it was outcome-determinative,” Hailes said.

In May 2000, after the first supposedly corrected batch of names was released, the election supervisor in Madison County found herself on the purge list. Ion Sancho, the election supervisor for Tallahassee’s Leon County, was the only election official to go through the list one by one. “We went for a five-for-five match,” he told Vanity Fair. “Those were criteria such as name, birth date, race, sex, Social Security number. When we applied that to this list of 697 that we got in 2000, I could verify only 33.”

Expand full comment

And pps (what the heck) about the Nader vote going to Gore: My creaky Way-back file has something about Gore being yet another oil oligarch scion: Armand Hammer? And, by golly, bell ringing about doing oil business with the USSR. Cue Twilight Zone theme. Everything old is new again.

Expand full comment

Jeesh! Looks like I got it in. Nation article only sampled. Neither you nor I tried to get the Pat Buchanan count. Thing is, doesn't so much sound horribly familiar, hello Georgia. Thom keeps us in touch with Greg Palast.

Expand full comment

As usual Tom hartmann can connect the dots better than anyone on Earth ever in my opinion. I think the only way America will survive as a first world nation is we must educate the right wing racist and Trump supporters. The New world order globalists are not racist and would prefer to hire the cheapest labor possible. The Trump supporters will find themselves out of a job where they can be tortured or their organs harvested with no minimum wage or social security benefits. Where they can be executed, sold as slaves and their children also, starved to death and consume poisoned food, drugs, water and air if they are lucky. We all know the fascist New world order globalists could care less about the poor people of any race. Ask a trump supporter who Trump would rather hire, cheaper illegals or American citizen Trump supporters. We must educate them before we end up like Somalia. We need to educate them by purchasing 15 second television ads repeating them thousands of times. Good day.

Expand full comment

During the last 40 years the baby Boomer voting class has been strangely absent in so many areas - while they have been trying to have a jolly good time themselves.

During these years the Democratic Party was taken over by urban elitists and, as a result, they decided to abandon all the hick rural areas and voters across America. As a result, our election system raised the Electoral College system's value to being the only way rural voters and smaller population states were able to have any influence. The Republican party was quite happy to get these voters.

The democratic party and urban voters stuck to their outlook on life and politics, and supported an increasingly left-leaning set of policies, with accompanying comments and stories illustrating their contempt for the hick rural voters.

The result is exactly what Mr. Hartman has so eloquently described; and the fact that America's middle class is even, numerically, rated at 49% shows that not everyone has lost. However, the unwritten, unfolding story is still adding to the bankruptcy status of all our young people with student loans, and the increasing number of health bankruptcies by older people with medical issues not covered by any insurance.

Recently the EU failed to agree to a minimum 15% corporate tax, and the US aggregate debt, along with the mountain of derivatives since the 2008 financial collapse is beyond comprehension.

We are, by all measures, facing a 1929 reset of the US and the global economy.

Unless, of course, US urban and rural voters agree to be polite to one another and find a basis of agreements that can re-balance America, for all of us. And set a floor for corporate behavior and taxation levels.

In the meantime, never voting for any senators and representatives will quickly introduce new people to serve us, instead of themselves.

Mr. Hartman citation:

Congress passed strict regulations on political campaign fundraising and spending with the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. Following the Agnew and Nixon bribery scandals (that led to Vice President Agnew’s resignation to avoid prison), Congress doubled-down by strengthening that law in 1974 and creating the Federal Elections Commission (FEC).

This outraged then-Senator James Buckley, the elder brother of the late William F. Buckley and now the Senior Judge for the DC Circuit Court. Most Republicans opposed those laws and agencies but he and his side in the Senate had lost the vote, so they became law and the FEC was created.

Like a sore loser, he sued, essentially saying that the “free speech” right of wealthy people like himself and his friends to buy off politicians was inhibited by such clean-campaign legislation.

The result, legalizing political bribery, was a first for America and the developed world. The Supreme Court ruled with and for Buckley, striking down nearly a century of campaign finance legislation going all the way back to Teddy Roosevelt’s Tillman Act.

Two years later, in the First National Bank v Bellotti case, Powell himself authored the decision that gave corporations that same legal right to bribe politicians or insert themselves into campaigns for ballot initiatives (among other things).

Prior to this, from the end of the Republican Great Depression right up until the Reagan Revolution — from 1933 to 1981 — the American middle class had a half-century of uninterrupted political and economic progress. About two-thirds of Americans were in the middle class when Reagan was elected in 1980.

Before Reagan, we’d passed the right to unionize, which built America’s first middle class. We passed unemployment insurance and workplace safety rules to protect workers. Social Security largely ended poverty among the elderly, and Medicare provided them with health security.

A top personal income tax rate between 74% and 91% throughout that period kept wages strong for working people and prevented the corrosive wealth inequality we see today. We didn’t get our first billionaire until after the Reagan revolution.

America built colleges that were free or affordable; gleaming new nonprofit hospitals; the world’s finest system of public schools; and new roads, bridges, rail, and airports from coast to coast.

We cleaned up the environment with the Environmental Protection Agency, cleaned up politics with the Federal Elections Commission, cleaned up corporate backroom deals with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We outlawed banks from gambling with our deposits via the Glass-Steagall law.

Then the Supreme Court legalized political bribery with the Buckley and Bellotti decisions (and tripled-down on them both with Citizens United in 2010).

Reagan was the first modern American president to jump through this newly opened door to giving government favors to corporations and wealthy individuals who threw their money at his political party.

Expand full comment